Episodes

  • H-Hour - 8

    H-Hour - 8
    Aug 17 2026

    Do you want the Liberty Dialogues System for free? It’s August 17, 2026.

    I usually do not make short videos. Why? People who scroll for a few seconds do not care about freedom. They want to be entertained.

    Maybe you are different. Maybe you actually give a damn.

    As of tonight or tomorrow, TheLibertyDialogues.com will be live. This is what I shared in the long video posted yesterday. Begin to defend yourself against the government. Go to thelibertydialogues.com and download the system for entire system for free.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    1 min
  • If you do not watch the long video...

    If you do not watch the long video...
    Aug 16 2026

    If you do not watch the long video, you are missing out!



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    Less than 1 minute
  • Now is the time...

    Now is the time...
    Aug 16 2026
    Please remember the number 871,987 and be sure to watch this entire video. You do not want to miss it.It is August 16, 2026.Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.I am Beau Johnson, creator of the Liberty Dialogues System which is helping people all over the world challenge government authority. I am a father, a graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, a former Army officer, and an author.We know that government can seize your property, livelihood, and freedom.I know that because it happened to me.Accused of willful failure to file federal income tax returns, I was placed into solitary confinement for months, locked in a small cell twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, with murderers surrounding me.Later, I was placed in isolation again inside a maximum-security federal penitentiary.As you can imagine, sitting alone behind a steel door, government power stops being abstract.You begin asking serious questions:Did the people exercising power actually have the authority?Was jurisdiction established?What facts were relied upon?What presumptions were made?I knew that I was innocent. As such, when I was in solitary confinement, I made a solemn commitment.I would help people understand how to question and challenge the machinery of government.What happened to me should not happen to you.I have fulfilled my commitment with the Liberty Dialogues System.And in a few minutes, I am going to show you how to get the LD System for free.The Liberty Dialogues teaches a disciplined method for examining government claims. And I will stress that most attorneys do not know this information or apply it.For example:By what authority?Under what jurisdiction?Based upon what facts?What status are you attributing to me?What presumption are you making?What creates the obligation?And what evidence supports it?The purpose is not to argue louder.Rather, it is to distinguish assertion from proof, presumption from fact, authority from jurisdiction, and a demand from an actual obligation.Rest assured, the Liberty Dialogues System has been used in real situations by people in court and dealing with government officials and agencies.Since we have tested the LD System and are confident of its capabilities, it is time to put it into the hands of anyone who wants and needs it for free.This is our goal:To add 871,987 Liberty Dialogues users before the November elections in the United States.Why?Our intention is to cause a revolution in thought, emotion, and action — a change in how people think about government power, how they respond when it is asserted, and how they act when something important is at stake.And we want this revolution to occur worldwide.Moreover, we want to combine the Liberty Dialogues System with initiatives around the world similar to ConstitutionalCounty.org — whereby informed people come together locally, question authority intelligently, build records, demand evidence, and hold government accountable where they live.Now here is the exciting news:As early as tonight, but certainly by tomorrow, the Liberty Dialogues System will be available online for free at TheLibertyDialogues.com.This video is a pre-launch notice.Hear me clearly:Get the Liberty Dialogues System for free.Study it.Watch the instructional videos.Analyze your case.Practice the method.Apply the system yourself.There is no need to pay in order to become a Liberty Dialogues user.That is intentional.The purpose is not to make people dependent upon us. It is to help them become independent and capable of thinking, questioning, and acting for themselves.Now, if you are someone who wants deeper training, direct access to experienced Liberty Dialogues users, and the opportunity to work through real documents and difficult situations, there is a second path.For $387, you can acquire the LD System and become part of the Liberty Dialogues training community.That includes weekly live calls, advanced instruction, practical application, document analysis, case studies, questions and answers, and interaction with veteran users.You are paying for training, experience, access, and community.So the distinction is simple:Learn independently for free.Or:Train with experienced users for $387.Both paths serve the same mission:871,987 additional people learning a disciplined and tested means to question and challenge government power.And this is where Constitutional County becomes essential.Liberty Dialogues equips people to understand and question authority.Constitutional County brings those informed people together locally — at the courthouse, sheriff’s office, zoning board, school board, and county commission — so they can organize, build records, ask common questions, and demand accountability where they live.The goal of 871,987 is therefore not merely a number.It is the beginning of a network of informed people prepared to bring this understanding into their own communities.Imagine those people asking better questions wherever authority touches their ...
    Show More Show Less
    9 mins
  • Guardian?

    Guardian?
    Aug 15 2026
    Imagine a family inside their home.A mother.A father.Their children.Their property.Their privacy.The walls of that home mark a boundary.Inside that boundary, the family has a right to be secure.Now imagine a stranger comes to the door and says:“I am coming inside.”The father asks:“Why?”The stranger says:“Because I have authority.”Would that answer be enough?Of course not.The next questions would be immediate:Who gave you that authority?What exactly does it allow you to do?Does it apply to this house?Does it apply to this family?What limits are placed upon it?That is how people naturally understand boundaries.Now expand that home.Expand it until the walls become the boundaries of a county.Inside that county are thousands of homes.Thousands of families.Businesses.Farms.Churches.Property.Livelihoods.And people whose liberty, privacy, and property can be taken or restricted.Now consider two different kinds of loss.A burglar breaks into a home and steals property.Everybody understands what happened.Someone crossed a boundary and took something without lawful authority.The sheriff investigates.But suppose the loss happens another way.A man’s property is seized.A woman’s business is closed.A family’s land is restricted.A home is searched.Money is taken.A citizen is detained.This time, the person causing the loss carries a government credential.And suddenly the response changes.“That’s the government.”“Comply now.”“Challenge it later.”“Hire an attorney.”“Take it to court.”Maybe years later someone will determine whether the government actually had the authority to do what it did.But by then, the property may be gone.The business may be destroyed.The money may be spent.The damage may be permanent.That is the distinction we need to understand.When a burglar enters a home, we ask immediately:What gives you the right to be here?When government enters the life of a citizen, too often we presume:They must have the right because they are government.That is backwards.Government has boundaries too.The Constitution establishes them.Law establishes them.Due process establishes them.Every office and every agency possesses only the authority law gives it.And that brings us to the sheriff.The sheriff is not the father of the people.The people are not children.The sheriff is not a king.He is not above the courts.He is not above state law.He is not above federal law.He is under the Constitution just like every other public official.But someone inside the county should be willing to ask questions when coercive governmental power is brought against the people.Not automatically oppose it.Not automatically approve it.Examine it.Who is acting?What are they proposing to do?What authority permits it?Does that authority apply to this person and this property?What process has been followed?What constitutional limitation controls the action?That is not opposition to law.That is insistence upon law.If the authority exists, show it.If jurisdiction exists, establish it.If the citizen has an obligation, identify it.If the process is lawful, demonstrate it.Then proceed according to law.But why should a citizen be required to surrender his property or liberty first and ask those questions years later?Return to the home.A stranger stands at the door and says:“I am taking your property.”The homeowner asks:“Under what authority?”And someone tells him:“Do not interfere. Let him take it. You can sue him later.”That would sound absurd in our homes.Yet that is often how governmental loss is treated.Suffer the loss first.Challenge the authority later.There is a tremendous difference between stopping an unlawful deprivation and attempting to repair one after it has already happened.That is why the sheriff matters.There should be someone in the county willing to ask the questions before the loss becomes irreversible.Before the property is taken.Before the business is destroyed.Before the citizen spends years fighting government alone.The sheriff does not need unlimited power to do that.He needs something far more important:The willingness to ask questions.The courage to demand answers.And the discipline to hold government to the same law government demands everyone else obey.Because the issue is not:Who has the biggest badge?It is not:Which government is more powerful?And it is not:Who claims authority?The question is:Does the authority actually exist?Every home has a boundary.Every county has a boundary.And every county should have a sheriff willing to look any public official—local, state, or federal—in the eye and ask:Who are you?What are you doing?What is your authority?Does it apply here?And are you staying within the law?Because if nobody is willing to ask those questions before the loss occurs, then the constitutional boundary exists only on paper.And a boundary that exists only on paper is no boundary at all. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
  • There is always the OBVIOUS!

    There is always the OBVIOUS!
    Aug 14 2026
    If you reach the end of this video and you do not visit constitutionalcounty.org, then you are either on life support, or you do not give a damn. It’s August 14, 2026, Welcome to yestohellwith.com.THE OBVIOUS ANSWERThere is a principle I try to live by.Occam’s Razor.Stripped to its essence, when we’re confronted with competing explanations for a problem, don’t unnecessarily complicate the answer.Look for the simplest explanation that adequately accounts for what we can actually observe.And I think we desperately need that discipline today.People everywhere know something is wrong.Government grows larger. Bureaucracies deepen. Rules multiply. Technology expands government’s ability to monitor and control.And ordinary people increasingly feel that their property, privacy, livelihood, family, and freedom are subject to institutions they can barely influence.So we search for answers.Maybe we need the right president.The right Congress.Maybe the answer is buried in some obscure statute or definition.Maybe it’s the UCC. Banking. Offset and discharge. Some forgotten jurisdictional theory. Some guru who claims to have figured everything out.And what happens?We fracture.We argue with one another.We disappear into theories.We spend years in the weeds.And government keeps expanding.So let’s apply Occam’s Razor.Strip away everything that is unnecessary.Reduce the problem to its essence.And ask one simple question:Will government answer to the People?Suppose I write the Internal Revenue Service and ask:What specific authority establishes the obligation you claim applies to me?I don’t want boilerplate responses.I don’t want a pamphlet that ignores the query.I want an answer the question.Suppose I write my senator or congressman:What is the constitutional authority for this particular exercise of federal power?Answer the question.Suppose a local official tells me what I may do with my own property.I ask:What authority permits you to interfere?Answer the question.Because what is representative government if government refuses to answer the people it supposedly represents?My point is that perhaps we’ve made our understanding of why government has run amok much more complicated than it needs to be.Consider this point:A government that will not answer to the People is a government that cannot meaningfully be held accountable by the People.That’s the issue.Accountability.I learned something about governmental power the hardest way imaginable.I spent four years in federal prison for failing to file federal income-tax returns.I spent months in isolation.I experienced diesel therapy.I lost property.I lost years of my life.And I suffered consequences within my family that remain with me today.Whatever conclusion you reach about my case, understand why I speak with urgency.Because when governmental power comes through your front door...the theories disappear.The courtroom is real.The handcuffs are real.The cell is real.The loss is real.And if overwhelming governmental power can descend upon one human being...it can descend upon another.So what is the answer?I don’t think we need another theory.We need a common cause.And perhaps that common cause is extraordinarily simple:Government must be accountable to the People.If government claims authority: PROVE IT.If government claims jurisdiction:Establish it.If government claims an obligation:Identify it.And before government takes property, restricts liberty, closes a business, or interferes with a family:Cite the lawful basis for doing it.That doesn’t require Republican or Democrat agreement.It doesn’t require accepting my theory of anything.It requires accountability.And where can we realistically restore that?I don’t believe we begin in Washington.We begin where we still look one another in the eye.Locally.Our county, sheriff, commissioners, local officials, neighbors.Imagine a county built around one fundamental expectation:Before government uses coercive power against a person, government MUST establish its authority.And now...imagine something.Imagine you’ve written the IRS.You asked:What law do you claim applies to me?What is your authority?What establishes your jurisdiction?Instead of direct answers, you receive boilerplate.You receive the same type of response from your elected representatives.No one answers your basic questions.Now imagine taking those letters and responses to your county sheriff.And the sheriff keeps them.As a record.A repository documenting the questions raised by the people in his county and the answers—or failures to answer—received from government.Now imagine that sometime later a federal SWAT team arrives at that citizen’s home.Vehicles.Weapons.Agents preparing to enter.And standing there is the county sheriff.He knows the history.He has the record.And he says:“Before this goes any further, I have documentation showing that this man repeatedly asked your agency to identify the legal authority underlying the ...
    Show More Show Less
    9 mins
  • What is action?

    What is action?
    Aug 13 2026
    ACTION BEGINS BY LISTENINGWhat does it mean to act?I hear the criticism.“All you do is talk.”“You make videos.”“You discuss the problems.”“But where is the action?”That’s a fair question.But I would ask you to consider something.Many people who watch these videos send me messages saying they’re praying for me and my family.They tell me to be careful.They express concern for my safety.Why?Because they understand that some of the things I am willing to say publicly are things many people are unwilling to say themselves.So apparently...words do matter.Apparently speaking can be an action.The question is whether those words accomplish anything.And that depends upon what happens next.Because action doesn’t begin when somebody marches somewhere.Action begins much earlier.Listening is action.Learning is action.Speaking is action.Sharing an idea is action.Teaching another person is action.And when those actions are directed toward a common objective, something else begins to happen.Understanding becomes consensus.And consensus can become collective action.Think about the frustration people feel today.Different people describe it differently.Different politics.Different experiences.Different theories about what went wrong.But underneath those differences there is a common angst.People feel that something fundamental has been lost.The ability to live your life.Protect your family.Enjoy your property.Pursue your livelihood.Exercise your natural rights.And sometimes simply...to be left alone.What if we stopped allowing every disagreement to divide us and instead found the common thread running through all of us?Not somebody’s guru.Not somebody’s theory.Not Republican versus Democrat.Not another national argument designed to consume every minute of our attention.Something much simpler.Freedom.Your life.Your family.Your property.Your community.And your right to live peacefully without government exceeding its lawful boundaries.What if we could agree on that?Then perhaps we could stop waiting for Washington to save us.And start looking closer to home.Our counties.Our communities.The places where we actually live.That is what we’re trying to build.Two new pages have been launched:Constitutional County.And:The Liberty Dialogues System.You’ll find them on Facebook, with expansion to X, TikTok, and other platforms.And I’m asking you to do something.Listen first.Don’t follow because I told you to.Listen.Examine the ideas.Ask whether they’re factually and truthfully based.Ask whether there is a common principle here that people with very different backgrounds can embrace.Then, if there is...act.Follow the pages.Share them.Send them to your family.Send them to your friends.Bring other people into the conversation.Our objective is extraordinary:871,987 followers within the next 87 days.Why?Because if nearly a million people can demonstrate that they share a basic understanding of freedom and are willing to organize around it...then we have something more powerful than another audience.We have a groundswell.And if we reach that objective, we intend to launch a major initiative designed to advance the cause of freedom—not simply nationally, but ultimately worldwide.Because freedom isn’t American.The desire to protect your family isn’t American.The desire to enjoy your property isn’t American.The desire to live your life without unnecessary interference isn’t American.Those things are human.So this isn’t about agreeing with me on everything.You shouldn’t.It isn’t about adopting another ideology.And it certainly isn’t about following another guru.It’s about finding the common thread.The basic premise upon which people who disagree about almost everything else can still stand together.If we can find that...If we can listen...If we can understand...If we can communicate...And if we can build consensus around something truthful...then we can begin acting together where action can actually make a difference.Locally.Go to ConstitutionalCounty.org.Find Constitutional County on Facebook.Find The Liberty Dialogues System.Follow them.Share them.And bring someone else with you.Don’t underestimate what you’re doing.Because action doesn’t always begin with doing something dramatic.Sometimes...action begins by listening.Then understanding.Then speaking.Then sharing.Then organizing.And finally...doing.Let’s see what happens when enough of us do those things together.And as always...May truth reign supreme. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
  • 87 Days...

    87 Days...
    Aug 12 2026

    87 DAYS

    I’m Beau Johnson, creator of the Liberty Dialogues System, and I’ve got a significant announcement.

    Two new pages on FB have been launched.

    The Liberty Dialogues System.

    And:

    Constitutional County.

    Now here is an exciting challenge.

    Over the next 87 days, the goal is to acquire 871,987 followers on EACH page.

    Why?

    At the end of 87 days, we intend to launch a major new initiative.

    So consider doing something simple. Follow The Liberty Dialogues System.

    Follow Constitutional County.

    Then share them.

    Send them to your friends. Your family. Everyone who believes freedom still means something.

    And don’t think small.

    Think globally.

    Freedom matters to people in every country on Earth.

    Spread the word like a wildfire out West pushed by a great wind.

    87 days.871,987 people.Two pages.One extraordinary objective.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • The Purple House

    The Purple House
    Aug 12 2026
    If this video about a PURPLE house piques your curiosity, be sure to visit constitutionalcounty.org afterward.You own your home.No HOA. No historic district. No private covenant controlling its color.One Saturday, you decide:I’m painting my house purple.You buy the paint and begin.Then a zoning official arrives.“You can’t paint your house purple.”You ask:Why not?He cites a municipal regulation and orders you to stop, restore the approved color, or face fines.Now forget about purple for a moment.The real issue is simple.You own the property. Government has crossed that boundary and told you what you may do with it.Maybe government has lawful authority to do that.Maybe it doesn’t.The question is:Where is the boundary, and who determines whether government has crossed it?Let’s run the scenario two different ways.SCENARIO ONE:You challenge the order.You hire a lawyer.Five thousand dollars becomes ten thousand.There are motions.Hearings.Briefs.You lose.You appeal.More lawyers.More money.Meanwhile, fines accumulate.Perhaps the city threatens a lien.Two years pass.Then three.Then four.You’ve spent $60,000 fighting over what color you may paint your own house.Finally, the highest court you can realistically reach says:No. The ordinance stands.Now, a property right does not mean every regulation of property is unconstitutional.But assume for our hypothetical that this particular restriction really did exceed constitutional limits.That changes the question.You possessed the right.Government crossed the boundary.You used the remedy government provided.And four years later, the system still didn’t protect the right.So what did you actually have?A right without an effective remedy.SCENARIO NUMBER TWOSame homeowner.Same house.Same purple paint.Same zoning official.But this time, when the city threatens enforcement, the sheriff becomes involved.And the sheriff doesn’t simply take the homeowner’s side.He investigates.He reads the ordinance.He examines the authority under which the zoning official is acting.He considers the state constitution and the federal Constitution.He asks:What governmental interest justifies this interference?Does the ordinance actually authorize it?Does that authority extend this far?And suppose the sheriff concludes that enforcement would exceed the city’s lawful authority and violate a constitutionally protected property interest.Now something changes.The sheriff tells the city:I will not participate in enforcing this action, and I believe the constitutional boundary needs to be resolved before government proceeds against this citizen.That doesn’t make the sheriff a judge.And it doesn’t give him unlimited authority.The sheriff is bound by the Constitution and the law just like the zoning official.He cannot arrest or cite someone simply because he disagrees with that person’s interpretation of the Constitution.But suppose state law provides an applicable offense for the official conduct involved and the facts establish the required legal basis.The sheriff investigates.The lawful process is invoked.And suddenly the constitutional question is no longer four years downstream.It’s at the point of enforcement.The dispute reaches court.The city must defend the authority being exercised.And in our hypothetical, the court concludes:The city exceeded its lawful authority.The city backs down.The homeowner finishes painting his house purple.WHAT CHANGED?Not the Constitution.Not the homeowner.Not the ordinance.The remedy changed.In the first scenario:Government acts.The citizen suffers the consequence.Then the citizen spends years trying to undo it.In the second:Government attempts to act.Another lawful authority examines the boundary.Enforcement is challenged before the deprivation becomes irreversible.That is the counterweight.And the sheriff’s role isn’t:“I outrank the zoning official.”It is:“Before I participate in governmental force against this citizen, establish the lawful authority for what government is asking me to enforce.”If the authority exists, government proceeds.If it doesn’t, government should stop.That’s the principle.The purple house seems trivial.That’s what makes the example useful.Because today the question might be:Can I paint my house purple?Tomorrow it might be:Can government take my business?My property?My home?My liberty?And then the question becomes much more serious:If the Constitution establishes a boundary around government, where is the practical remedy when government crosses it?A right written on paper is important.But a right with an effective remedy is what makes the boundary real. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins