YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith
Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Who are THE PEOPLE?
    Aug 23 2026
    WHO ARE “THE PEOPLE”?The Declaration of Independence says:“It is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish” government.The People.Those may be the most important two words in this entire series.Because the Declaration does not say:The right of a person.One individual cannot announce:“I have concluded that government is illegitimate, therefore government no longer exists.”Nor can an individual simply declare that laws no longer apply to him.That isn’t popular sovereignty.The Declaration places this extraordinary political right with:The People.And eleven years later, the Constitution begins with exactly the same principle:“We the People.”Not:We the Congress.We the President.We the Supreme Court.We the People.Government is their creation.And that means the ultimate political authority does not originate inside the institutions exercising governmental power.It originates with the political community that created them.But that creates a difficult question.How do millions of people become:“The People”?They don’t all gather in a field and raise their hands.They develop understanding.They communicate.They organize.They build consensus.They vote.They petition.They serve on juries.They elect representatives.They amend constitutions.They reform institutions.And when necessary, they change the governmental structures under which they live through legitimate political processes.That is self-government.And this is why something I’ve said repeatedly matters:Before the People can act together, they must understand together.Not agree about everything.That will never happen.Republican.Democrat.Conservative.Liberal.Independent.Those differences don’t have to disappear.There is a much more fundamental question upon which we should be able to find common ground:What is government for?The Declaration gives us an answer.Government is instituted to secure rights.Its just powers are derived from the consent of the governed.That principle belongs to no political party.And perhaps that is where genuine political restoration begins.Not by asking everyone to agree with us.But by asking better questions.What authority has actually been delegated?What are its boundaries?Who has jurisdiction?What obligation has actually been established?What permits enforcement?And what remedy exists when government crosses the line?Imagine those questions spreading.One person begins asking them.Then ten.Then a thousand.Then a million.Eventually something changes.Not merely government.The governed.They become harder to manipulate because they demand evidence.Harder to divide because they understand the principle they share.Harder to govern through presumption because they have learned to ask:What establishes that?And that is where the Liberty Dialogues System fits into something much larger than an individual dispute.It teaches a discipline of inquiry.Don’t begin with:“Government is corrupt.”Show me.Don’t begin with:“They have no authority.”Ask them to identify it.Don’t merely announce:“My rights were violated.”Identify the conduct.Identify the boundary.Establish the evidence.And demand the remedy.Now imagine an entire community thinking that way.Imagine asking candidates for sheriff:What are the limits of your authority?Ask your county officials:What does your oath require when another governmental authority crosses a constitutional boundary?Ask legislators:What authority supports this exercise of governmental power?Ask judges:Where is the remedy when the right is being destroyed now?Politics begins to change when the questions change.And that is why I believe restoration can begin locally.A county is small enough for the People to know one another.To organize.To educate.To evaluate candidates.To demand accountability.To establish expectations for constitutional government.And then demonstrate that it works.County by county.State by state.The objective is not to destroy constitutional government.It is to make constitutional government work.And perhaps that is the greatest lesson in the Declaration’s extraordinary language concerning alteration and abolition.Knowing that the People possess an ultimate remedy should make us more determined to use the remedies that come before it.Correct what can be corrected.Reform what can be reformed.Alter what must be altered.And never casually destroy what can still be restored.But never forget who created whom.Government did not create the People.The People created government.Government does not possess unlimited authority over its creators.Its powers were entrusted to it.Its boundaries were established around it.And its legitimacy rests upon accomplishing the purpose for which it was instituted.To secure the rights of the People.That leaves us with a responsibility.Become informed.Teach others.Build the record.Demand evidence.Organize locally.Hold constitutional officers accountable.And build sufficient understanding that when the People speak, they do so not...
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
  • To Abolish Government...
    Aug 22 2026
    WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO “ABOLISH” GOVERNMENT?There may be no word in the Declaration of Independence more provocative than:Abolish.The Declaration says that when a form of government becomes destructive of the ends for which government was instituted, it is the Right of the People:“to alter or to abolish it.”We examined alter in Part Four.Alter means there is still something worth repairing.But abolish presents a fundamentally different proposition.It means the People have concluded that alteration is no longer sufficient.So let’s be precise.What exactly are the People abolishing?Government itself?Law?Courts?Civil order?No.Read the Declaration carefully.It speaks of:“any Form of Government.”That distinction is critical.The principle is not that society should exist without government.The principle is that the People are not permanently bound to a form of government that has become destructive of the purpose for which government was instituted.And the Declaration proves that point in the very same sentence.It doesn’t say:Abolish government—and walk away.It says the People possess the right:“to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”There is the part people often leave out.Institute new government.So abolition, in the Declaration’s framework, is not an argument for anarchy.It is a claim about political legitimacy.Government exists because the People instituted it.Government possesses delegated power because political authority originated somewhere beyond government itself.And if the governmental form becomes fundamentally destructive of its purpose, the Declaration says the People retain the ultimate authority to replace that form.But now comes the difficult part.Replace it with what?Because destroying an institution is easy compared with building a better one.What authority would the replacement government possess?What authority would it be denied?Where would federal power end?Where would state power begin?What authority would remain local?How would the judiciary be constrained?How would executive power be limited?How would property be protected?How would due process operate?And when the new government crossed the boundary—where would the remedy be?Those questions expose something important.The objective cannot simply be:Different people in power.We’ve done that repeatedly.Presidents change.Congress changes.Judges change.Governors change.Political parties change.But if the structure permits the same concentration and exercise of power, changing the people occupying the offices may change very little.The deeper objective must be:Government that remains limited regardless of who controls it.That means any replacement government must face exactly the same questions the Liberty Dialogues asks of the government we have now.Where does your Authority come from?What establishes your Jurisdiction?What Status brings a particular person or property within that jurisdiction?Who has Standing to invoke your power?What establishes an Obligation?And what authorizes Enforcement?Above all:What are you presuming that must instead be demonstrated?Those questions cannot disappear simply because we trust the people creating the new system.Because eventually those people will be gone.That is the lesson.Never build government around good rulers.Build government around the possibility of bad ones.Put boundaries around power that remain when the personalities change.And create remedies capable of enforcing those boundaries when they are crossed.That is why the word abolish should never be spoken casually.It carries an enormous responsibility.If the People ever conclude that a governmental form must be abolished, they inherit the burden of creating something better.Not merely different.Better.More accountable.More limited.More difficult to abuse.And more capable of securing the rights for which government was instituted in the first place.So the Declaration presents the People with both an extraordinary right—and an extraordinary responsibility.The right to reject a governmental form that has become destructive.And the responsibility to institute a government more likely to secure their safety, happiness, and liberty.But that leaves one enormous question.The Declaration doesn’t say:It is the right of an individual.It says:It is the Right of the People.So who are “the People”?How do millions of individuals legitimately exercise a collective political right?And how does an idea become the will of the People rather than merely the opinion of one person?That is where we finish this series.Part Six: Who Are “The People”?And as always—May truth reign supreme. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
  • Download the Liberty Dialogues System
    Aug 21 2026

    Over the last week, nearly 5,000 people have begun following this Facebook page.

    First, thank you. I sincerely appreciate your interest and your willingness to support this effort.

    But I want to note something.

    With nearly 5,000 new followers on FB alone, there aree only 500 downloads of the Liberty Dialogues System.

    So if you are following because you believe in this effort, because you want to learn, or to understand what how to change the culture of government, I encourage you to take the next step.

    Go to TheLibertyDialogues.com and download the entire Liberty Dialogues System.

    It is free.

    There is no obligation. Get it. read it, study it, and use it.

    And here is why this matters.

    The more people who understand the Liberty Dialogues System, the more people we will reach in the months ahead.

    Understanding spreads.

    Confidence spreads.

    People begin asking better questions. They begin thinking differently about authority, jurisdiction, responsibility, and government itself.

    And that is how culture begins to change.

    Not simply because government suddenly decides to change—but because we change first.

    We change our own minds.

    We change our own hearts.

    We change what we are willing to accept without question.

    And as more people do that, government will eventually have to respond to a different kind of citizenry.

    My goal is simple:

    5,000 followers on FB. 5,000 downloads.

    If you’re going to follow, then truly follow.

    Go to TheLibertyDialogues.com today.

    Thank you for your support.

    And as always, May truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.