YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

Summary

 YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Welcome, Senator Ted Budd

    Welcome, Senator Ted Budd
    May 11 2026

    It is May 11, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    Have you heard about the letter from Senator Ted Budd of North Carolina to a YTHW member who has the SOU for You package and the Statement of understanding.com program? Well, you will not want to miss the Liberty Dialogues conference call tomorrow night at 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

    Now understand what this means.

    People are beginning to put their beliefs,their questions,and their positions—on the record.

    And the responses they receive matter.

    Because these responses reveal how representatives fail to address the issues being raised regarding authority, taxation, jurisdiction, and obligation.

    So during this call, we are going to examine these responses structurally through the Liberty Dialogues framework.

    Additionally, given the nature of this call and the importance of the issues involved, those who have the SOU4U package are invited to attend.

    The Ted Budd Letter takes on even greater importance for those who have the statementofunderstanding.com program. Because you are serious about defending your rights and responding appropriately to representatives and agencies when these issues arise.

    We are going to focus specifically on the Ted Budd letter and examine both the Liberty Dialogues response and ChatGPT’s response under the LD framework.

    Why?

    Because the goal is not emotional reaction.

    The goal is to learn how to create a better record.A clearer record.A more disciplined record.

    Particularly when agencies and members of Congress fail to meaningfully respond to the actual issues being raised.

    When you have a StatementofUnderstanding and good faith belief documentation, you will understand why this program is so critical to your defense in the event that any crisis occurs.

    Because once your beliefs,your questions,and your position are documented properly,the record itself begins to matter.

    And as always—

    May truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • The FBI... COMPETENT?

    The FBI... COMPETENT?
    May 11 2026
    It is May 11, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.Today we discuss something most Americans never stop to consider.What exactly is the FBI supposed to do before a federal prosecution begins?Most people assume the answer is obvious.Investigators verify.They authenticate.They challenge assumptions.They independently establish the factual foundation of the case.And perhaps most importantly…people assume the FBI does not simply accept the narrative of a bank or institution without independently confirming it.But according to the Orlando Carter materials…that is precisely the concern.The allegation is not merely that the FBI reached the wrong conclusion.The allegation is that the FBI never verified the underlying structure of the case before the prosecution moved forward.Now think carefully about what this means.The government’s theory depended upon a four-million-dollar obligation.So naturally the next questions become:Did the FBI obtain the authenticated loan records?Did the FBI independently verify the obligation?Did the FBI conduct forensic accounting?Did the FBI contact the OCC?Did the FBI independently confirm that the debt legally existed?Did the FBI distinguish between a lease structure and a loan structure?Did the FBI examine whether corporate resolutions lawfully authorized the obligation?Did the FBI ascertain the laws and regulations for the State of Ohio?These questions were never adequately resolved.And this matters enormously.Because once investigators accept an assumption…that assumption begins hardening into investigative reality.Then prosecutors inherit the assumption.Then the courtroom inherits the assumption.Then the jury inherits the assumption.And eventually…assumption becomes “the record.”This is exactly what we discussed in the earlier series:The Collapse of the Burden of Proof.Because in many prosecutions…the public assumes the burden was already satisfied before trial even begins.But what if the burden itself was never independently established?Now according to the later filings and OCC materials, including admission by PNC bank that there was no $4 million loan,major contradictions emerged.But by then the case had already moved through:investigation,indictment,trial,and conviction.And that reveals something important.The moment Presumptions become institutionalized…the system begins defending the assumptions themselves.That is why the investigation stage matters so much.Because once the structure moves forward…reversing it becomes extraordinarily difficult.Now let’s understand something else carefully.Most Americans believe investigators are gathering facts in a neutral environment.But investigations are shaped by pressure, timing, institutional expectations, and narrative formation.Once a bank identifies itself as the victim…and once investigators begin operating from the assumption that the financial obligation exists…every subsequent step begins moving downstream from that assumption.This is where the Liberty Dialogues framework becomes extremely important.Because under LD analysis, the proper sequence requires:Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.Enforcement.But in this case, the obligation itself was never independently authenticated in the manner the public expects.Now think carefully about what happens if that sequence reverses.If investigators begin from the assumption that the obligation exists…then every later question becomes distorted by that premise.The issue quietly shifts from:“Did the obligation actually exist?”to:“Did the defendant conceal the obligation?”That distinction changes everything.Because once the first question disappears…the second question begins operating as though the structure beneath it was already proven.That is exactly what occurred.Now this is why the FBI investigation matters so much years later.Later contradictions raise questions not merely about the prosecution…but about whether the investigation itself independently verified the foundational structure before the criminal case was ever built.And once the prosecution moved forward…those assumptions became harder and harder to challenge.Where were the investigators willing to slow the process down and independently verify the structure before lives were destroyed?Where were the prosecutors willing to revisit assumptions when contradictions emerged?Where were the institutions willing to admit that a foundational premise was never properly established?Because if the investigative foundation was flawed from the beginning…then every later stage inherits that flaw.And once institutional momentum takes hold…truth itself becomes secondary to preserving the structure already built upon the assumption.Next episode…When A Bank Becomes The Victim.And we begin examining how institutional credibility and banking prestige may shape federal prosecutions long before jurors ever enter the courtroom.And as always…may truth reign supreme. Get full ...
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
  • Does the $4 million loan exist?

    Does the $4 million loan exist?
    May 10 2026

    The $4 Million Loan

    It is May 10, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    Today we begin examining the centerpiece of the Orlando Carter prosecution.

    The alleged four-million-dollar obligation.

    Now understand this carefully.

    This was not a side issue.

    This was not a minor detail buried somewhere inside the prosecution.

    According to the government’s theory of prosecution this alleged obligation formed the structural foundation of the fraud narrative itself.

    Without the obligation…

    large portions of the prosecution’s theory weaken dramatically.

    And this is where the public must begin slowing down and asking difficult questions.

    Because according to the Carter’s own records, serious contradictions emerged then and years later concerning whether the obligation actually existed in the manner presented during trial.

    Now before we proceed further…

    let us establish something important.

    Most Americans hear the phrase:

    “federal financial prosecution”

    and immediately assume:

    surely the FBI verified the debt.

    Surely prosecutors authenticated the records.

    Surely the bank’s narrative was independently tested.

    Surely the obligation legally existed.

    And surely the underlying structure was examined before criminal prosecution began.

    But according to the Carter’s documents that assumption is the entire problem.

    Because years later…

    major contradictions reportedly began emerging.

    The OCC reportedly reflected only a two-hundred-fifty-thousand-dollar obligation on file.

    Not four million.

    Then

    PNC stated in a judicial filing that it “does not and never has asserted that it made a $4 million loan to CBST.”

    Now pause and think carefully about what that means.

    Because according to the prosecution theory…

    this alleged obligation formed the centerpiece of the fraud case.

    Yet years later…

    according to the Carter’s records, the OCC reflected only a $250,000 debt.

    Authenticated records remained unresolved.

    And PNC later disclaimed the existence of the alleged loan itself.

    This becomes extremely important.

    Because under ordinary assumptions…

    most people believe the government independently verifies the financial structure before building a federal prosecution around it.

    But according to the Carter’s files, that independent structural verification never occurred properly.

    Now understand something carefully.

    This series is not arguing that every banking inconsistency proves innocence.

    The issue is much more structural.

    The issue is whether:

    investigators,

    prosecutors,

    and later federal officials

    independently verified the existence and structure of the obligation before transforming it into criminal reality.

    Now this is where the Liberty Dialogues framework becomes important.

    Because under LD analysis, the proper sequence is:

    Authority.

    Jurisdiction.

    Status.

    Standing.

    Obligation.

    Enforcement.

    Under that framework…

    obligation must be independently established before enforcement legitimately proceeds.

    But, in Carter’s tragic example, that sequence was reversed.

    The prosecution proceeded first without confirmation of PNC’s accusation.

    Now think about the implications of this.

    If the obligation itself was never independently authenticated in the manner the public assumes and expects…

    then the prosecution narrative may have hardened into reality before the foundation beneath it was fully verified.

    And that brings us directly into the next stage of the story.

    The FBI investigation.

    Because investigators are supposed to independently test allegations before they advance the recommendation that criminal conduct has been confirmed, and prosecutors transform them into criminal charges.

    But, as we know from Carter’s records, which you will understand soon,

    that investigative verification never occurred in this case.

    Next episode…

    The FBI Investigation.

    And as always…

    may truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    5 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.