YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

About this listen

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith
Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • FREE Audio and IRS Letters to Study!
    Jan 30 2026

    It’s January 30th.Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

    I mentioned last week that I made a speech to a local political party after my release from prison. That speech is available for download along with the transcript on yestohellwith.com to the left of the donation button free of charge.

    Back in 2016 and 2017, I focused on one thing—and I still do:

    Jurisdiction.

    I’ve also posted the IRS materials a viewer requested.This package is to the right of the donation button and includes the IRS Letter, the person’s response and a recommended response based upon the Liberty Dialogues concepts about jurisdiction. It is free for anyone who cares to have it.

    For Inner Circle and Patriot members, your membership page now includes a full study package of the same material in the IRS package as well as more redacted letters and a comprehensive study guide that shows responses for a number of various IRS letters.

    This is not a silver bullet.It does not fix IRS problems.It preserves position.

    Now, very plainly:

    If you do not own the Liberty Dialogues, you are missing the core tool I use on this platform. They are not just books. They are a working library, and as AI has stated, the Liberty Dialogues is a living system for authority, jurisdiction, status, standing, obligation, and presumption. I am learning more than I ever imagined from this process and platform and the answers are evolving.

    I have to remind you that if you have the Liberty Dialogues and the SOU for You package, you will become more informed, more confident, and more independent.

    If you email me or ask me a question in chat, you will not receive a response unless you have the SOU for You package at a minimum.And even then, I may not respond, depending on the question.

    And one final point:

    Anyone who intends to participate in the upcoming Statement of Understanding program—which documents good-faith beliefs before any government action—must already have the SOU for You package.

    If you do not also have the Statement of Understanding package together with the Liberty Dialogues volumes, you are missing the foundation of this work.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • A STATUS-based Excise Tax!
    Jan 30 2026

    It is January 30. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    If you want to understand what a lawful status-based excise tax actually looks like, you need an example where Congress does everything openly:it defines the status,limits the class,identifies jurisdiction,and lets obligation follow.

    A clean example is the Special Occupational Tax on certain firearms businesses.

    The taxing statute is 26 U.S.C. § 5801.

    This is not enforcement.This is not regulation.This is the levy itself.

    THE TAX IMPOSED — STATUTORY TEXT

    26 U.S.C. § 5801(a) states:

    “There is hereby imposed on each importer, manufacturer, and dealer in firearms a special (occupational) tax at the following rates:”

    “(1) Importers, manufacturers, and dealers in firearms other than destructive devices—$1,000 a year.”

    “(2) Importers, manufacturers, and dealers in destructive devices—$1,000 a year.”

    That is the tax.

    Congress is not taxing income.Congress is not taxing transactions.Congress is not taxing people for existing.

    Congress is taxing a defined occupational status.

    WHEN LIABILITY ATTACHES — STATUTORY TEXT

    The statute continues.

    26 U.S.C. § 5801(b) provides:

    “The tax imposed by subsection (a) shall be paid for each place of business for each taxable year.”

    This matters.

    The obligation:

    attaches to a place of business,

    operated by a person engaged in the regulated occupation,

    for a defined taxable year.

    No business → no tax.No occupation → no status.No status → no obligation.

    WHO IS SUBJECT — STATUTORY CONTEXT

    The terms importer, manufacturer, and dealer are not guesses.They are defined elsewhere in the National Firearms Act, including 26 U.S.C. § 5845, and implemented through regulation.

    This means the class is:

    narrow,

    knowable,

    provable,

    and limited by statute.

    LD ANALYSIS — WHY THIS EXCISE IS LAWFUL

    This statute passes every LD test without strain.

    1. AUTHORITY

    Congress has explicit authority to:

    regulate certain classes of firearms,

    license and oversee regulated industries,

    impose excise taxes on occupations within that domain.

    There is no authority gap here.

    2. JURISDICTION

    Jurisdiction does not arise from citizenship.It does not arise from residence.It does not arise from existence.

    Jurisdiction arises because a person voluntarily enters a federally regulated occupation.

    You are not born a firearms manufacturer or dealer.You choose to become one.

    That choice is the jurisdictional hook.

    3. STATUS

    The tax applies only after a specific legal status exists:

    being an importer, manufacturer, or dealer in regulated firearms.

    That status is:

    voluntary,

    defined by statute,

    tied to regulated activity,

    limited in scope.

    No presumption is required.

    4. OBLIGATION

    Only after:

    authority exists,

    jurisdiction is triggered by voluntary entry,

    status is established by conduct,

    does the tax obligation attach.

    That is the correct order:

    Authority → Jurisdiction → Status → Obligation

    Nothing is reversed.Nothing is assumed.

    THE CORE LD DISTINCTION

    A real man or woman is not taxed by existence.A legal role is taxed by statute.

    Section 5801 governs a status Congress created and regulates.It does not claim ownership over the living.

    This is why LD does not oppose excise taxes.LD opposes status by presumption and jurisdiction by silence.

    This excise works because:

    the status is defined,

    the class is limited,

    jurisdiction is voluntary,

    and obligation follows structure.

    That is law functioning properly.

    ONE-SENTENCE LD SUMMARY

    The special occupational tax under 26 U.S.C. § 5801 is a lawful status-based excise because Congress explicitly taxes a voluntarily assumed, federally regulated occupational status and imposes obligation only after authority, jurisdiction, and status are established.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
  • A Legitimate Federal Excise Tax
    Jan 29 2026
    It is January 29. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.If you want to understand what a lawful federal excise tax actually looks like, you start with one where Congress does everything out in the open.That example is the federal excise tax on air transportation.The taxing statute is 26 U.S.C. § 4261.This is not enforcement.This is not procedure.This is the levy itself.THE TAX IMPOSED (STATUTORY TEXT)26 U.S.C. § 4261(a) states:“In general.—There is hereby imposed upon the amount paid for taxable transportation of any person a tax equal to 7.5 percent of the amount so paid for such transportation.”That sentence alone matters.Congress does not suggest a tax.Congress does not imply a tax.Congress says, plainly:“There is hereby imposed.”That is a lawful levy.The statute then continues.26 U.S.C. § 4261(b) adds:“Domestic segments.—In the case of taxable transportation which begins and ends in the United States, there is hereby imposed a tax of $3.90 for each domestic segment of such transportation.”(amount adjusted over time)Then Congress defines the scope.26 U.S.C. § 4261(c):“Taxable transportation.—For purposes of this section, the term ‘taxable transportation’ means transportation by air—(1) which begins and ends in the United States, or(2) which begins or ends in the United States.”Nothing vague.Nothing assumed.The taxable event is fully defined.Now comes the most important part — the part most tax statutes avoid.WHO IS LIABLE (STATUTORY TEXT)26 U.S.C. § 4261(d) states:“By whom paid.—The taxes imposed by this section shall be paid by the person making the payment for such transportation.”That is the liable party.Not “citizens.”Not “residents.”Not “United States persons.”Not “taxpayers” by assumption.The person who pays for the airline ticket.No payment = no tax.No ticket = no liability.NOW THE LD ANALYSIS (WHY THIS IS LEGITIMATE)This statute passes every LD requirement cleanly and honestly.1. AUTHORITYCongress has undisputed authority to:regulate interstate and international air transportation,tax activities occurring within federally regulated airspace,impose excises on transportation.Authority is explicit and constitutional.2. JURISDICTIONJurisdiction does not arise by status.It arises by voluntary conduct.You buy airline transportation →you enter a federally regulated commercial domain →jurisdiction attaches.No purchase, no jurisdiction.No jurisdiction, no tax.This is not coercion.It is choice.3. STATUSNotice what Congress does not do.It does not:ask who you are,ask where you were born,ask your residency,ask your citizenship.Why?Because this is a transaction-based excise, not a status-based tax.Your status is temporary and provable:you are a purchaser of taxable air transportation.That is enough.4. OBLIGATIONOnly after:the taxable event occurs,jurisdiction is triggered by conduct,the liable party is identified,does obligation arise.Not penalties.Not enforcement.Obligation.This is the correct order:authority → jurisdiction → status → obligation.This is what lawful federal taxation looks like:The tax is clearly imposed by CongressThe taxable event is clearly definedThe liable party is explicitly namedJurisdiction is voluntary and limitedNo human being is taxed by existenceNo status is presumedCompare that with systems where:status is assumed,jurisdiction is implied,definitions are skipped,obligation is asserted first.That is not taxation.That is presumption.The Liberty Dialogues does not reject federal taxation.It rejects taxation without structure.The airline excise tax is legitimate because:Congress imposed it openly,confined it narrowly,and tied liability to voluntary participation in a federally regulated activity.That is law done correctly.And that is the benchmark every claimed tax must meet. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.