YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

About this listen

 YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • A YTHW Contest

    A YTHW Contest
    Apr 10 2026

    It is April 10. Welcome to yestohellwith.com I am going to offer a contest. Here is the challenge. I am going to give you a quote from ChatGPT from Volumes 4 and 5 of the Liberty Dialogues. Whoever explains why and how this quote is an affront to freedom and Americans will receive a gift. Send me a DM or private message or an email to info@yestohellwith.com. Use your intellect and knowledge. Think through this test. Please do not use AI to get your answer. Here is the quote: “The Constitution does not protect survival from taxation. It protects against specific forms of taxation (direct unapportioned taxes). The framers did not draft a survival exemption clause” If you were on the Liberty Dialogues call yesterday or listened to the conversation on a replay, you are not eligible.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    1 min
  • Oaths and Bonds

    Oaths and Bonds
    Apr 10 2026

    It is April 10. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. Today we will begin a video series on oaths and bonds.

    First, two announcements: YTHW will draw a winner of the Liberty Dialogues Series on April 15. You must have the SOU for Package. Enter by sending an email with your name and email used to get the SOU for You package. 2) Volumes 4 and 5 are now available on jbj.com (bowers) at a 50% discount. Now for today’s video.

    Video 1 — The Promise They Made: Why Public Officials Must Take an Oath

    It is April 10th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

    Today we begin one of the most important subjects in the Liberty Dialogues.

    Most people believe that if a person has a badge, a robe, a title, a business card, or an office, then he automatically has authority. But in the Liberty Dialogues, we do not begin with assumptions. We begin with proof.

    The first question is not: what did the official do?

    The first question is: by what authority did he do it?

    In the Liberty Dialogues, the order is always the same:

    Authority. Jurisdiction. Status. Standing. Obligation. Enforcement.

    And all of that exists under the umbrella of presumption.

    The system wants you to presume that a judge is a judge because he sits on the bench. That a sheriff is a sheriff because he wears a uniform. That a prosecutor is a prosecutor because his name appears on a document.

    But that is not proof.

    The law has long required many public officials to take an oath of office before they may lawfully exercise authority. Why? Because the oath is the promise. It is the act by which the official publicly declares that he will support and obey the Constitution and the laws.

    Without the oath, there is a serious question:

    Did the person ever lawfully qualify for the office at all?

    The Liberty Dialogues teaches that authority must be proven before it may be presumed.

    If an official has no oath, then the foundation of his claimed authority is weakened.

    And there is a second issue.

    Many officials are not only required to take an oath—they are required to obtain a bond.

    The oath is the promise. The bond is the accountability.

    The bond is the financial guarantee that if the official acts unlawfully, dishonestly, or outside his authority, there may be a source of recovery.

    Think about this.

    If a government official can seize your property, arrest you, fine you, tax you, or interfere with your life, should you not have the right to know:

    Did he ever take the oath? Did he ever post the bond? Did he ever lawfully qualify?

    The Liberty Dialogues does not teach blind defiance. It teaches disciplined inquiry.

    Do not argue first. Do not make accusations first.

    Instead, ask for the proof.

    Where is the oath? Where is the bond? Where is the evidence of lawful authority?

    That is where we begin.

    And as always, may truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • What is a question worth when it is not earnest?

    What is a question worth when it is not earnest?
    Apr 10 2026
    It's April 10th. Welcome to Yes to Hell with.com. I usually write my video scripts before I produce them today. For this video in particular, I'm going to talk straight without a script extemporaneously, and I'm gonna speak from my heart.I have been doing these videos for several months now, and I get comments and emails, messages from many people with questions, and these questions are sourced in ignorance and fear. They're emotional, they're reaction. They're not generally proactive. Some of them are. Most of them are matters of curiosity.And I think the problem in America, especially because I've seen a different litmus test produced in other countries like Australia or New Zealand, for example, where America is so hardened by the process of presumption that it's automatic, that we reflexively are inclined to obey, we're less likely to challenge.We live a generally comfortable life in this country. So to capitulate, to comply, to cooperate and graduate, to get along, to move along is the overarching mentality. Generally, because people don't want the conflict. They just simply wanna be left alone. They want their bag of chips with garlic tip and their basketball games and football, their weekend golf, whatever.It doesn't matter. People don't want to be bothered. And I get that. But the point is this, I will not answer questions unless somebody is serious. And they're only serious when they actually have the liberty dialogues and they begin to use them. Now, here's the curiosity. A gentleman by the name of, I think Curtis Johnson, leveled an accusation at me the other day that I'm not answering key questions on.On social media, and I think I responded, and you probably heard the video that I, I'm not here to answer questions. I'm here to find the select few who actually want to discipline their minds and hearts to pursue an understanding of how the process works so that more of us can prevail against the presumptive authority of the system because it is that difficult in this country to pierce through it.Meanwhile, people are looking for solutions. They want me to give 'em solutions. Where are your solutions? All you do is talk. Well, those people don't listen. Many people who listen to my videos repeatedly because it's a repeated theme in context, they're learning about the Liberty Dialogues order of authority, jurisdiction status, standing obligation enforcement over with an overarching presumption of, with an overarching umbrella of presumption.So here's the point. If you are serious about your life and you are serious about solutions, get the Liberty Dialogues. Most gurus are charging thousands of dollars for solutions that don't work, and they require you to learn a whole different language that you're expected to place into the system that operates in the language you do not understand.The bottom line is, is that if you want solutions in your life, don't seek it from outside people. You're not getting solutions from me because I'm empowering you to use the Liberty Dialogues at a very modest price point right now of $48 to get the answers that you should have that the gurus don't know to give you.So think about this for a second. There are people on Yes to hell with who are employing the Liberty dialogues to resolve complex legal and court cases. Not that the solution will be to their liking, but they're doing it on their own without a lawyer saving tens of thousands of dollars, saving a lot of time and aggravation, and going in and pro per representing themselves prevailing to whatever degree of success they have in a system that they would've never dared to enter in the first place.And they're not asking me the question. But I'm helping them understand how to use the Liberty Dialogues construct because AI recognizes the Liberty Dialogues framework as a fundamental constitutional, truth based application of law. That is powerful. Now, if you're looking for short videos and you don't bother to listen to these long videos, you're not invited.Because you don't have what it takes to help solve the problems that you have. You're looking for a quick fix and you certainly can't help other people fix what's ailing America. So to those select view who listen, who listen to these videos, I encourage you to get the Liberty Dialogues because I'm now beginning to do an outreach program with those who use the Liberty Dialogues and come to the calls.I'm having them invite friends and family of people who want to learn because they trust the very people who are using the application right now. Now, if they don't have anybody because they want proof, that's great. We don't wanna spend time with people that want proof because this requires work and discipline and it requires one to be honest with him or herself.So I wanted to take the time and explain that. Now finally, there is a conference call tomorrow for those with the SOU for You program at 11:00 AM Eastern time. I invite you to attend and as always, may ...
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.