YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • The Questions at the heart of it all...

    The Questions at the heart of it all...
    Jul 30 2026
    Throughout history, free people have preserved their freedom not merely by defending it, but by first understanding it.The American Republic was founded upon enduring principles concerning the nature of man, the source of rights, the limits of public authority, and the proper relationship between the People and those entrusted with public office. These principles did not arise from convenience or political opinion. They formed the intellectual and moral foundation upon which the Republic was established.Over time, many of these first principles have been forgotten, misunderstood, or replaced by assumptions that have altered the relationship between the People and public authority.The purpose of these Thirty-One Questions is to return to those first principles.They are not offered as accusations.They are not offered as political statements.They are not offered to condemn.They are offered to encourage thoughtful reflection upon the truths that sustain a free country.Each question invites the reader to examine a foundational principle of freedom. Each corresponding thesis expresses a conclusion drawn from that principle. Together, they establish the philosophical foundation for everything Americans and all people know to be true, and good and just. If the People and those entrusted with public office can once again agree upon these first principles, then the path toward preserving freedom becomes clearer, constitutional government becomes stronger, and the Republic itself becomes more secure.The questions are therefore offered in the spirit of thoughtful inquiry, respectful dialogue, and a shared commitment to preserving a country where free people may continue to live in freedom.THE THIRTY-ONE QUESTIONS OF A FREE PEOPLEand Their Corresponding Theses1. What is the natural condition of every person?Thesis: Every person is born free.2. From where do rights originate?Thesis: Rights are inherent in every person.3. Does government create rights?Thesis: Rights neither originate with nor depend upon government.4. What is the purpose of the Constitution?Thesis: The Constitution exists to establish and limit public authority while protecting the freedom of the People.5. Does the Constitution grant rights?Thesis: The Constitution does not grant rights; it recognizes and protects them by limiting public authority.6. Whom does the Constitution limit?Thesis: The Constitution limits those entrusted with public authority—not the freedom of the People.7. From where does all public authority originate?Thesis: The People are the source of all delegated public authority.8. Why do public offices exist?Thesis: Every public office exists solely because the People created it.9. How much authority does a public office possess?Thesis: No public office possesses authority beyond that lawfully entrusted to it.10. What accompanies every delegation of authority?Thesis: Every delegation of authority carries an equal obligation of accountability.11. For whom does public office exist?Thesis: Public office exists to serve the People—not to govern their lives.12. Upon whom rests the burden when freedom is restricted?Thesis: Those who seek to restrict freedom bear the burden of justifying both their authority and their actions.13. May authority simply be presumed?Thesis: Authority must never be presumed.14. What must exist before authority may lawfully be exercised?Thesis: Jurisdiction must be established before authority may lawfully be exercised.15. What protects the People from arbitrary exercises of authority?Thesis: Due process protects every person from arbitrary exercises of authority.16. What is the first duty of every public office?Thesis: The first duty of every public office is the preservation of the freedom of the People.17. What is the relationship between peace and freedom?Thesis: Peace cannot long exist where freedom is absent.18. Why is private property essential?Thesis: Private property is indispensable to the preservation of freedom.19. Why is the family indispensable?Thesis: The family is the first institution of every free society.20. How is freedom most often lost?Thesis: Freedom is seldom lost all at once; it is usually diminished one unlawful exercise of authority at a time.21. What happens whenever public officials exceed the authority entrusted to them?Thesis: Whenever public officials or public employees exceed the lawful limits of their authority, freedom is diminished.22. To whom is every public official accountable?Thesis: Every public official remains personally responsible for the faithful exercise of the authority entrusted to the office.23. What is the oath of office?Thesis: The oath of office is a solemn covenant with the People.24. To whom is the oath ultimately given?Thesis: The oath binds every public official to faithfully support the Constitution before faithfully serving any person, agency, department, or institution.25. What happens when an oath is ignored?Thesis: Every violation of the oath ...
    Show More Show Less
    9 mins
  • The Liberty Dialogues Conference Call

    The Liberty Dialogues Conference Call
    Jul 30 2026



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    1 min
  • A future of your own making!

    A future of your own making!
    Jul 29 2026
    The Sheriff, the Garden, and the ConstitutionPerspective changes everything.Imagine it is the year 2041.You wake up and everything seems normal.Your phone recognizes your face.Your driver’s license, passport, bank account, medical records, and travel history are all connected through a single digital identity.It feels convenient.Until one morning your vehicle won’t start.A message appears.“Monthly fuel allocation exceeded.”Later that day, you stop at the grocery store.You place a package of steaks on the checkout counter.The register rejects the purchase.“Monthly meat quota exceeded.”You decide to leave town for the weekend.Your travel request is denied.Not because you’ve committed a crime.Not because you don’t have the money.Simply because the system says no.Now ask yourself...Is this the society you want your children and grandchildren to inherit?Most people would answer,“Absolutely not.”Then ask yourself another question.When did it begin?Did it begin with artificial intelligence?Digital identification?Carbon tracking?Facial recognition?Or did it begin years earlier...When people accepted one small restriction after another because someone simply said,“The rule applies to everyone.”If you only examine today’s ordinance...You’ll never recognize tomorrow’s society.Now let me tell you a story.Imagine a widow who has lived on her property for thirty years.Every spring she plants a large vegetable garden.It feeds her family, and she shares the extra food with elderly neighbors.She harms no one.Yet one afternoon a zoning official measures her garden and hands her a citation.He tells her she needs a permit or she must reduce its size.The widow asks a simple question.“Why do I need permission to grow food on my own property?”The official replies,“Because the ordinance applies to everyone.”Stop right there.That single sentence reveals the real issue.No one asked whether anyone had been injured.No one asked whether the garden endangered the public.No one asked whether government possessed constitutional authority to interfere with a peaceful activity.Authority was simply presumed because an ordinance existed.That is how liberty is lost.Not all at once...But one assumption at a time.Unable to get an answer, the widow visits the sheriff.She doesn’t ask him to abolish zoning.She simply says,“Sheriff, I’m being punished for growing food on my own property, and I haven’t harmed anyone.”Now the sheriff faces a choice.He can think like an administrator.Or he can think like a constitutional officer.If he thinks administratively, the matter is finished.“The ordinance exists.”“My job is to enforce it.”But suppose he understands the office he holds.He visits the property.He investigates.Then he asks four simple questions.Who has been injured?No one.Whose property has been damaged?No one.Who has been defrauded?No one.Who has lost liberty?The widow.Then he asks the only question that matters.If there is no injured party, no damaged property, no fraud, and no threat to public safety, by what constitutional authority may government punish this peaceful woman?At that moment...The conversation changes.It is no longer about gardening.It is about constitutional authority.The sheriff contacts the zoning department.The official repeats,“The ordinance applies to everyone.”The sheriff replies,“That is precisely the question.Does it?Before my office participates in depriving this citizen of her liberty, I want to know what constitutional authority justifies this action.”County attorneys become involved.State officials become involved.The newspapers criticize the sheriff.Some accuse him of refusing to enforce the law.But they misunderstand his position.He is not refusing to enforce the law.He is refusing to presume that every governmental command automatically possesses constitutional authority.Those are not the same thing.His oath was never to every ordinance.His oath was to the Constitution.If every regulation overrides constitutional liberty simply because it exists...Then constitutional government has already failed.Think about how we normally respond when government issues an order.The citizen is expected to comply.To hire an attorney.To spend years proving why government should leave him alone.That turns constitutional government upside down.Government should bear the burden.Government should explain why it possesses authority before interfering with the peaceful exercise of liberty.That is the conversation almost nobody is having.People ask,“What law applies?”Far fewer ask,“Why does it apply?”One question assumes authority.The other requires authority to be demonstrated.That difference changes everything.Now replace the garden.A father fishing with his son.A rancher building a stock pond.A homeowner collecting rainwater.A family building a cabin.The activity changes.The principle does not.If government may presume authority over every peaceful act unless ...
    Show More Show Less
    8 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.