YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

Season's Savings | $0.99/mo for 3 months

Auto-renews at $8.99/mo. after 3 months - terms apply.
YesToHellWith exposes the lies and condemns them to hell.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Benjamin Glassman is emblematic of the problem!

    Benjamin Glassman is emblematic of the problem!
    Oct 11 2026
    It is October 11, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.I am in Mexico, witnessing the extraordinary destructive force of Hurricane Simone.The waves are enormous.They are pounding the coastline, destroying beaches, and washing away the sand beneath massive rocks.Foundations supporting walls and businesses are being undermined.Heavy rocks are being hurled fifty to one hundred feet by the force of the ocean.Water is saturating everything.And the destruction continues.As I watch this hurricane unleash its fury, I cannot help but think about another destructive force.The federal government of the United States.Imagine a hurricane entering your life.Not as wind and water, but as the FBI, the IRS, the Department of Justice, federal prosecutors, and the courts.Imagine the government descending upon you with overwhelming force.Your finances disappear.Your reputation is destroyed.Your business collapses.Your family suffers.Your freedom is taken.And just as the hurricane washes away the sand beneath a building, the government can wash away the very foundation of a person’s existence.But there is one extraordinary difference.A hurricane is a force of nature. Government is a force of human decisions.A hurricane has no conscience.It swears no oath.It recognizes no constitutional limitations.But government officials do.They are entrusted with authority that must remain within the boundaries of the Constitution.And when they exceed those boundaries, the destruction they cause is not an unavoidable act of nature.It is the consequence of human decisions for which human beings must be held accountable.Consider Orlando Carter.I maintain that Carter is an innocent man who was convicted in federal court and sentenced to fifteen years in prison for a crime he did not commit.His life was devastated by the enormous force of the federal government.And when I brought evidence challenging his conviction to Benjamin Glassman, then United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, Glassman had an opportunity to confront that injustice.Instead, Glassman stated that evidence concerning the disputed four-million-dollar loan had been shredded.I accuse Benjamin Glassman of lying. Since there was no $4 million loan, nothing could have been shredded.I condemn his conduct, and I intend to demand accountability for his actions and the responsibilities of his office.The evidence supporting that accusation will be examined in the episodes that follow.But today, my message is much larger than Benjamin Glassman or Orlando Carter.It is time for Americans to fundamentally change how we confront government power.For too long, we have talked.We have complained about corruption.We have debated statutes, regulations, words, and definitions.We have documented abuses, discussed judicial decisions, and argued endlessly about what government officials have done wrong.And what has changed?The machinery continues operating.The investigations continue.The prosecutions continue.The enforcement continues.And Americans continue suffering the consequences of governmental power exercised without sufficient accountability.We must stop merely discussing what government does wrong and begin challenging its authority to do it.That is the fundamental distinction.The question is not simply whether a government official made a mistake.The question is whether that official possessed lawful authority to act as he did.What constitutional authority permitted the action?What facts established jurisdiction?What obligation was proven?What lawful authority justified the enforcement?And when an official exceeded his authority, what consequences followed?Those questions must become the foundation of our response to government.We must also confront the legal protections that can make accountability extraordinarily difficult.Sovereign immunity.Official immunity.Prosecutorial immunity.These doctrines have legal boundaries and purposes, but they must not become an excuse for abandoning accountability.No government official should be permitted to violate the law and then use the power of his office to escape every meaningful consequence.Public authority must carry personal responsibility.And responsibility must carry accountability under law.The American people must stop accepting the proposition that government officials can destroy lives while the institutions employing them simply move forward.A constitutional republic cannot function that way.We must demand more than another explanation.More than another hearing.More than another investigation that produces no consequences.We must demand lawful authority, competent performance, truthful representations, and meaningful accountability.And when those responsibilities are violated, we must pursue the remedies available under the Constitution and the law.This is precisely why we developed the Liberty Dialogues System.Liberty Dialogues challenges the presumptions upon which governmental authority so often operates.It examines ...
    Show More Show Less
    10 mins
  • CounstitutionalCounty.org

    CounstitutionalCounty.org
    Oct 10 2026

    Join Now!



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • They NEVER had what?

    They NEVER had what?
    Oct 9 2026

    AUTHORITY FIRST — THEY NEVER HAD IT!

    Liberty Dialogues | ConstitutionalCounty.org | theyneverhadit.com

    For decades, Americans challenging the federal income tax have been fighting the wrong battle.

    They argue over statutes, regulations, definitions, and the meaning of words. Who is a person? What is income? Who is subject to the code?

    STOP ARGUING OVER THE WORDS!

    There is one question that must come before all the others.

    WHERE DID THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GET ITS ALLEGED AUTHORITY TO TAX THE EARNINGS OF THE PRIVATE AMERICAN?

    Before Congress can impose an obligation, it must possess the constitutional authority to do so. Before the government can claim jurisdiction, it must establish the lawful foundation for that jurisdiction.

    And before an American is threatened with confiscation, prosecution, or imprisonment, shouldn’t the government be required to establish the authority it claims to exercise?

    A STATUTE CANNOT CREATE AUTHORITY THE CONSTITUTION NEVER DELEGATED. A REGULATION CANNOT MANUFACTURE JURISDICTION. AND NO DEFINITION CAN TRANSFORM AN ALLEGED POWER INTO A LAWFUL ONE.

    Yet Americans continue arguing over the language of statutes while neglecting the fundamental question of authority.

    WE ARE DEBATING THE RULES BEFORE ESTABLISHING WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT HAD THE POWER TO MAKE THEM!

    The government invokes Article I, the Sixteenth Amendment, and the Internal Revenue Code as the foundation for its claimed taxing authority.

    But invoking a constitutional provision is not a substitute for examining what that provision actually authorizes, what limitations remain, and whether the asserted jurisdiction reaches the individual.

    AUTHORITY FIRST. JURISDICTION SECOND. APPLICATION THIRD. DEFINITIONS LAST.

    This is the discipline of the Liberty Dialogues System.

    And this is the foundation of our mission at ConstitutionalCounty.org: restoring constitutional accountability, beginning in every American county.

    But there is something even more important.

    THEY NEVER HAD IT!

    That is the central proposition examined in the Victory series and at theyneverhadit.com: that powers exercised and accepted for generations must be traced to their original constitutional foundation, rather than justified through accumulated statutes, regulations, and judicial interpretations.

    VISIT THEYNEVERHADIT.COM.

    Discover the argument that challenges the very foundation of the government’s alleged authority.

    Stop wasting years arguing over definitions.

    DEMAND THE SOURCE. EXAMINE THE JURISDICTION. CHALLENGE THE PRESUMPTION.

    Because if the Constitution never delegated the power, no amount of legislative language can create it.

    THEY NEVER HAD IT.

    As always, may truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.