YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

Summary

 YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Special Invitation to a Liberty Dialogues Call

    Special Invitation to a Liberty Dialogues Call
    May 5 2026

    It is May 4th, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. Now listen, this is a late video in the evening here, and I’m going to address a very specific issue and make a very special invitation. I get an incredible amount of emails and text messages on social media about questions that people have. I get a slew of requests to help people with particular problems, and one of the messages that I fail to articulate well, and I fail to repeat it sufficiently, is that like those who have the SOU for You package, which has the Liberty Dialogues series within it, five volume series. Those who have that package are duplicating my efforts. They ask themselves the questions that they would ask me, which is the value of the Liberty Dialogues. It is a constitutional truth-based platform when used with AI and used correctly, and it will give you answers to questions that you send me. This is one of the main reasons that I spend time promoting the Liberty dialogues. And holding live workshops during the week. So here is a proposal if you have questions. If you have issues in your personal life and you don’t have the time or inclination or even the money to talk to a lawyer and you want answers that are more credible than what you may hear through normal channels, then I encourage you. This is a special invitation. To come to a live workshop tomorrow night, a live video conference call and learn how to use the Liberty Dialogues framework within ai, and I use chat GBT to get the answers that will help you. You don’t need to talk to me. If you learn this process, you’ll be your own best lawyer. You will be your own best investigator. Why? Because you have the Liberty Dialogues series. And what I do on these calls is I educate people on how to use them. I talk about my history and how they came to be this Liberty Dialogue series. I explain how to use them with chat, GBT, and I go through examples with people. I go through their personal examples now. Take this to heart as opposed to asking me or anybody. And if you would rather get the answer yourself by doing a little bit of work for a modest price point of some 60 to $70 with the SOU for you package, you will be your own best advocate. So here’s the bottom line. I receive a lot of emails and texts and messages about people and their problems. Now I can’t answer them, and I only talk to those who have the SOU for you package. It’s a liability insurance that I have to use. I can only speak with those who want to be educated about how to find answers themselves. So here’s the deal, you, tomorrow night we’re going to have another live session if you want to attend. This live call and you do not have the SOU for you package, the Liberty Dialogue Series and you have doubts or questions and you don’t want to commit, then come to this call. I will give you special access. You will receive an email and all you need to do is follow the instructions. Send an email to info at yes to hell with.com and enter the words need special access. Okay. So I hope this helps you. I often am concerned that people don’t understand why I do not respond. There’s too much risk. So I am proposing that if you want to attend the live call, to attend the live call, and as always. It may truth remain supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    5 mins
  • How to handle yourself in court.

    How to handle yourself in court.
    May 4 2026
    It is May 4, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com Most Americans lose in court for a simple reason—They don’t understand the system they’re walking into.They don’t understand what prosecutors do…Why they do it…Or how the process actually works.And because of that—The courtroom becomes intimidating.The judge… the setting… the procedure—It all feels overwhelming.So people react instead of respond.But once you begin to understand the structure—What the prosecutor is doing…How the process unfolds—Everything changes.Now you’re no longer guessing.Now you’re no longer reacting.Now you can stand with clarity—And engage the process properly.But understand this—What I’m sharing with you here is a conversation.This is not how it happens in court.In court—You won’t have minutes.You’ll have seconds.Seconds to respond.Seconds to ask.Seconds to act.So use this as a framework—Not a script.Because over the next few videos—We’re going to break this down into exactly what to say…And how to handle the judge—In real time.And as always—May truth reign supreme.(You are present in the courtroom, composed, waiting for your case to be called. You are not reviewing arguments. You are not preparing defenses. You are reminding yourself that you are not here to react—you are here to proceed in order. You remain silent, observant, and deliberate.)(Your case is called. You step forward calmly.)Good morning, Your Honor.Yes, Your Honor. I am present and prepared to proceed.(As the court begins moving toward substance—charges, allegations, or facts—you do not respond to the substance. You pivot.)Your Honor, before responding to the substance of the allegations, I would like to clarify the foundation of this proceeding so that I can respond appropriately and in an informed manner. I am not attempting to delay or disrupt the proceeding. I am seeking to understand the structure being applied so that my response is accurate and appropriate.To begin, Your Honor, I would like to understand the source of authority being exercised in this matter. Is the authority being applied constitutional, statutory, or regulatory in nature, and what specific provision is being relied upon to authorize this proceeding against me in this case? I am not asking for a general statement of authority. I am asking for the identification of the specific source so that I can understand the basis upon which this matter is proceeding.(If a vague or general answer is given)Respectfully, Your Honor, that appears to be a general conclusion. I am seeking the specific source of authority that gives rise to that conclusion so that I can properly understand and respond.Assuming authority is identified, I would next like to understand jurisdiction. What jurisdiction is being asserted in this matter? Specifically, is the court asserting subject-matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, or both, and how has that jurisdiction been established in this case? What facts or conditions place me within that jurisdiction? I am asking so that I can understand how the authority being cited is being applied to me in this context.Next, Your Honor, I would like clarification regarding my status in this proceeding. How am I being classified under the authority being relied upon, under what legal definition, and where is that definition located? Because my understanding is that classification determines applicability, I need to understand what status is being applied and how that status has been established in this case.Next, I would like to understand standing. Who is bringing the claim in this matter, under what authority, and what specific injury or violation is being asserted? I am not asking for assumptions or general statements. I am asking for identification of the party and the basis upon which the claim is being made.Next, Your Honor, I would like to understand the obligation being asserted. What specific duty is being claimed, where is that duty defined, how is it applied, and most importantly, how does that obligation apply to me in this case given the answers to authority, jurisdiction, and status? I am asking for clarification so that I can understand whether the obligation being asserted has been properly established.Only after these elements are clearly established does enforcement become relevant. So before addressing any penalties, consequences, or outcomes, I am seeking clarity on the foundation upon which enforcement would rest.(If interrupted or pressured)Your Honor, I will be concise. I am not making an argument at this stage. I am asking for clarification so that I can respond appropriately within the structure being applied. Without that clarification, any response I give would be based on assumption rather than understanding.(If told to move forward or that it is not relevant)Understood, Your Honor. My concern is that without identifying the foundational elements, any further step would rest on presumption. I ...
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
  • The Liberty Dialogues Framework

    The Liberty Dialogues Framework
    May 3 2026

    It is May 3. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    Up to this point, we have examined the structure of prosecution…And we have established the Liberty Dialogues framework as the proper method of response.

    Today—We apply it.

    Because understanding theory…Is not enough.

    It must be used.

    So let’s walk through a simplified case structure—

    A person is charged.Multiple counts.Allegations presented.The process begins.

    Most people respond immediately to the charges.They defend actions.Explain circumstances.Attempt to justify behavior.

    But within the Liberty Dialogues—We do not begin there.

    We begin with Authority.

    What is the source of authority being exercised?Is it constitutional?Statutory?Regulatory?And how does it apply to this case?

    Next—Jurisdiction.

    Where is this authority being applied?Geographically?Subject-matter?Personally?

    And how is jurisdiction established in this case?

    Then—Status.

    How is the individual classified?Under what definition?Does that definition actually apply?

    Then—Standing.

    Who is bringing the claim?Under what authority?What specific injury is being asserted?

    Then—Obligation.

    What specific duty exists?Where is it defined?How is it applied?Where is the proof that this obligation applies in this case?

    Only then—Do we arrive at Enforcement.

    Here is the key insight:

    If any prior element fails—Enforcement cannot stand.

    Now compare that to what typically happens:

    A person is charged.They accept jurisdiction.They accept status.They accept standing.They assume obligation.

    And then they negotiate enforcement.

    Without ever testing the foundation.

    This is not about being argumentative.This is about engaging properly.

    With order.With discipline.With structure.

    Once applied—The case slows down.Assumptions are interrupted.Questions are introduced.

    And the process becomes visible.

    Does this guarantee outcome?

    No.

    But it guarantees clarity.

    And clarity allows truth to emerge.

    So the lesson is simple:

    Do not start at the end.Start at the beginning.

    Follow the sequence.Test each element.Require proof.

    And do not allow the process to move forward—Without structure.

    Because once you do—You are no longer being carried by the system.

    You are engaging it properly.

    And as always—

    May truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.