YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

This Season's Biggest Deal | $0.99/mo for 3 months + $20 Audible bonus

Auto-renews at $8.99/mo. after 3 months - terms apply.
Summary
 YesToHellWith exposes the lies and condemns them to hell.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Unsubscribe.

    Unsubscribe.
    Nov 5 2026
    PRESUMPTION, MORAL DEPRAVITY, AND THE DESTRUCTION OF DISCERNMENTI recently produced a video examining the Seven Deadly Sins.Pride. Greed. Lust. Envy. Gluttony. Wrath. And slothfulness.I invited Americans to consider how these destructive human characteristics manifest themselves in our institutions, our government, and particularly in the conduct of political parties.I questioned how the Democratic Party of today compares with the principles once represented by John F. Kennedy.Someone responded by asking me to remove their contact information because, apparently, my observations suggested that I had aligned myself with someone they considered untrustworthy.Interesting.But I have a question.WHAT EXACTLY DID I SAY THAT WAS UNTRUE?What proposition did I advance that was incorrect?What evidence did I present that was false?And what principle did I violate?None of those questions was addressed.Instead, a presumption concerning my supposed political allegiance became the basis for a judgment about my trustworthiness.And therein lies the very problem I have dedicated my work to exposing.PRESUMPTION IS NOT EVIDENCE.OPINION IS NOT KNOWLEDGE.AND JUDGMENT WITHOUT DISCERNMENT IS NOT WISDOM.Let me make something perfectly clear.I am not interested in promoting political parties.I have never aligned myself with a political party or candidate in my videos.Politics is not my mission.It makes no sense to devote my efforts to the political theater of Republicans against Democrats when the underlying problem is far more fundamental.My objective is to teach people how to think.How to recognize presumptions.How to challenge propositions that have no evidentiary foundation.How to distinguish lawful authority from the mere assertion of authority.And, most importantly, HOW TO DEFEAT UNLAWFUL EXERCISES OF POWER.That is the purpose of the Liberty Dialogues.Not to decide which political party should govern Americans.But to examine whether government itself is operating within its lawful authority.Now, consider the consequences when government abandons that responsibility.Consider immigration.I have criticized Democratic immigration policies that, in my judgment, permitted the entry or release of large numbers of people without adequate regard for the consequences of those decisions.But the question is not whether an immigrant is a Democrat or Republican.Nor should anyone presume that an immigrant is a criminal.The question is whether governmental officials exercised their authority lawfully and responsibly.When a person with a documented history of serious violent crime is released into a community and subsequently rapes, murders, assaults, or molests another innocent person, we must ask:WHO AUTHORIZED THAT RELEASE?What did the responsible officials know?What law governed their decision?What risks were identified?And were their lawful obligations fulfilled?We are not discussing an abstract political disagreement.We are discussing a woman whose life has been devastated by rape.A child who has suffered abuse.A husband who has lost his wife.Parents who have buried their daughter.A family whose life will never be the same.And I want to know by what authority governmental officials may disregard foreseeable threats to innocent people.Consider the fentanyl crisis.Families across America have suffered the devastating consequences of drugs trafficked through international criminal networks and distributed throughout our communities.We should examine the border, the ports of entry, the trafficking networks, and every enforcement failure.Not through political slogans.THROUGH EVIDENCE.Because the life of a child lost to fentanyl is not a Republican issue.It is not a Democratic issue.IT IS A HUMAN TRAGEDY.And the protection of innocent human life is a moral responsibility.This is why I condemn policies and governmental decisions that I believe have subordinated the rights of peaceful people to political objectives.I have been especially critical of the direction of today’s Democratic Party.I believe that many of its policies represent a profound departure from the constitutional principles I associate with the American Republic.That is my judgment.And I invite anyone who disagrees to examine the policies, the actual decisions, the governing law, and their consequences.But my criticism does not make me a Republican.And criticizing Republicans does not make me a Democrat.MY STANDARD IS NOT PARTY.MY STANDARD IS PRINCIPLE.And those principles apply equally to the United States and to governments throughout the world.This brings us directly to the Liberty Dialog System.We examine AUTHORITY.We examine JURISDICTION.We examine STATUS.We examine STANDING.We examine OBLIGATION.And we examine ENFORCEMENT.We ask government to establish the authority it claims to possess.We examine the boundaries of that authority.We identify the rights of the people affected.We determine the obligations that government has undertaken.And we challenge enforcement that...
    Show More Show Less
    10 mins
  • The Election...

    The Election...
    Nov 4 2026



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins
  • Suppose this was your grandmother...

    Suppose this was your grandmother...
    Nov 4 2026

    thelibertydialogues.com



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.