It is April 18. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. Mr. Wayne, you are missing the point because you are treating this video as though it were a law-school lecture.It is not.This video was made for ordinary Americans—people who have never read a Supreme Court case, never studied constitutional limits, and have spent their lives being told one thing:“Do not ask questions. Just obey.”The purpose of the Liberty Dialogues is not to teach people that government is always wrong. The purpose is to teach people that government is not automatically right.You say the answer is the Constitution, statutes, and judicial decisions. Fine. Then people have every right to ask:What part of the Constitution? Which statute? Which regulation? Which case? And what are the limits?That is not fantasy. That is the beginning of legal analysis.The problem is that Americans encounter officials in the hundreds of thousands every day. Police officers. Code enforcement. Tax agencies. Judges. Clerks. Administrative boards. Licensing departments.And far too often, those officials do not stay within the actual borders of the law, the ordinance, the regulation, or even the court ruling they claim to enforce.Instead, they presume. They expand. They improvise. They act as though their opinion or office policy is the law.

A police officer claims authority the statute does not grant. An agency creates rules that do not exist. A judge ignores the actual limits of a law and rules according to preference, politics, or convenience.And yes, courts do this too. Courts have often been wrong. They upheld segregation. They upheld internment. They have expanded government power far beyond what earlier generations believed possible. And later courts have reversed them.So please do not pretend that asking questions is somehow improper. If courts can question prior courts, then the people can question officials.The Liberty Dialogues framework is simple:Authority. Jurisdiction. Status. Standing. Obligation. Enforcement.Most of the modern system begins at the end—with enforcement—and assumes that all the earlier questions have already been answered.The Liberty Dialogues say: No. Ask the earlier questions first.By what authority? What are its limits? To whom does it apply? Has the official exceeded those limits?That is not radical. That is what a free people are supposed to do.What is most revealing about your criticism is the tone. You did not ask questions. You did not seek clarification. You simply walked into a lesson intended for ordinary people and announced that it was wrong.That reflects a kind of presumptive arrogance—the same arrogance many Americans encounter every day from officials who assume that because they wear a badge, hold an office, or sit on a bench, they no longer need to explain themselves.The video is not for appellate judges. It is not for law professors. And it is not for people who believe that authority never has to justify itself.It is for ordinary Americans who need to understand one simple truth:Government in America is supposed to be limited. Officials are supposed to stay within those limits. And the people have every right to ask where those limits come from.Because the real problem in America is not that too many people ask questions.The real problem is that too few do.

Can You File a Claim Against a Public Official’s Bond?

It is April 18th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com.

Many people ask: can I make a claim against the bond?

Sometimes, yes.

But you must understand the difference between: - A complaint - A lawsuit - A claim against the bond

A bond claim is usually made directly to the surety company.

You identify: - The official - The office - The bond number - The misconduct - The damages

Then you send notice.

For example:

“Please accept this as notice of claim against Bond Number 12345 issued for John Smith, Sheriff of Page County. On April 1, 2026, Sheriff Smith seized my property without lawful authority. Attached are the records, correspondence, and damages.”

Do not exaggerate. Do not become emotional.

Facts. Dates. Documents.

The Liberty Dialogues teaches that the strongest claim is not the loudest claim. It is the best documented claim.

And remember:

The bond company may not want to pay. But they may also not want a claim history.

That gives you leverage.

This video is for April 18th. Welcome to Yes to hell with.com. There will be an inner circle call this evening as announced by email and Patriot members are invited to attend. We will be discussing the curriculum about language, words, definitions, meanings, and posture. I encourage you to attend this call.If you're not able to make it. I will have a recording and I will post it on the membership page of yes to hell with.com. If you are interested in taking this course, then go to Yes to hell with.com and become an Inner Circle or Patriot member. Now tomorrow we will have a Liberty Dialogues video call on how to use the.Liberty Dialogues Framework with chat GPT or ai. This will be Saturday morning, the 11:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. This is a very powerful call. Once you get the SOU for you package. I discuss how to use the Liberty dialogues with ai and then we go live on my computer and we look at examples. I'm gonna be inviting Chief Blue Mahi to the call tomorrow because I have some of his letters that I'd like to share with his commentary along with me.He's got letters prepared for the IRS or a case with Louisiana, both of them and AI Chat. GBT has stated that his record is stronger. Than the agencies. It does not mean that the presumptive system is gonna cave and give him a win, but it does show the power of the Liberty dialogues and the work that he is doing by himself after he went through my sessions and he is doing excellent work.

So I invite you to get the SOU for you package. If you are international, just get the Liberty Dialogues international package. And you are permitted to attend the calls. These are very, very informative and eye-opening calls and I really believe that, not even personally myself, I, I don’t realize the power of the Liberty dialogues and I’m not overselling it.

I just, I think it’s a valuable tool and I think we can cripple the legal industry by using these kinds of platforms. The Liberty Dialogues platform. To prepare our own defenses and our own actions and our own suits. Now, as a final notice, the statement of understanding.com is online and people are ordering this comprehensive defense against a cataclysmic crisis like I went through with the IRS.

If you want to and need to prepare your good faith defense. And establish a statement of understanding and document it for future reference. This is vital. It comes with two components, the understanding that you write and the series of good faith belief letters that you send to senators and congressmen and agencies compelling them to respond so that you actually have a track record to substantiate your good faith beliefs.

And that’s it. I’ll see you tonight on the Inner Circle and Patriot Call. And as always, may truth reign Supreme.