YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Regulatory Saturation

    Regulatory Saturation
    Aug 27 2026
    REGULATORY SATURATIONThe System You Cannot SeeThere is something happening in America that almost everyone has experienced, but very few people can name.You feel it when someone tells you how tall your grass can be.You feel it when government tells you where you can park your own vehicle.You feel it when someone tells you what kind of structure you can build on your own property.What size your house numbers must be.Where you can put a fence.Whether you can put up a sign.Whether you need permission to operate a business from your home.Whether you can keep certain animals.Whether you can have an open container of beer while sitting on your own property.Each time it happens, we tend to look at the individual rule.The zoning ordinance.The building code.The parking regulation.The alcohol ordinance.The licensing requirement.The environmental regulation.The tax provision.And when each rule is examined separately, there is usually an explanation for it.Public safety.Public health.Order.Property values.Environmental protection.Revenue.Community standards.And that is precisely why we rarely see what has happened.We examine the strands without seeing the web.I want to give that web a name.Regulatory Saturation.Regulatory Saturation occurs when laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, licenses, permits, administrative rules, and enforcement mechanisms accumulate to such an extent that virtually every aspect of ordinary life falls within some category of government regulation.And here is what makes it so difficult to recognize.Nobody had to design the entire thing.Congress passes one law.A state legislature passes another.A county adopts an ordinance.A city adopts a code.An agency writes regulations.A board establishes standards.Another agency creates licensing requirements.Another creates reporting requirements.Another establishes penalties.Each government body may be addressing only the subject directly in front of it.But you don’t live inside just one of those regulations.You live inside all of them at the same time.Think about your house.To you, it is your home.But through the regulatory system, it may simultaneously be real property, a zoning classification, a taxable parcel, a structure subject to building codes, an address subject to identification requirements, property subject to maintenance ordinances, and perhaps property governed by environmental, utility, fire, occupancy, parking, or land-use requirements.Nothing about the house changed.What changed was the number of governmental categories surrounding it.Now expand that beyond your house.Your automobile.Your work.Your business.Your children.Your property.Your income.Your animals.Your land.Your transactions.Your licenses.Your permits.Your recreation.Your everyday conduct.Eventually something extraordinary happens.Government does not have to announce:“We intend to control every aspect of your life.”It merely has to regulate thousands of separate aspects of life.The cumulative result can begin to look remarkably similar.And that creates an even more serious problem.When government confronts you about something, the discussion usually begins with:“Here is the law.”Or:“Here is the ordinance.”Or:“Here is the regulation.”And because we have lived our entire lives surrounded by regulation, most of us immediately begin arguing about what the rule says.But perhaps we have started one question too late.Before asking:“What does the rule say?”perhaps we should first ask:“What gives this government body authority to regulate this particular matter, in this particular way, against this particular person, under these particular circumstances?”Those are not the same questions.The existence of a regulation and the lawful application of that regulation are separate inquiries.That does not mean the regulation is invalid.It does not mean government lacks authority.It means something much simpler:Authority should be demonstrated, not merely presumed from the existence of the rule itself.And Regulatory Saturation makes that distinction extraordinarily difficult to see.Because once virtually everything has been regulated, the existence of regulation begins to feel like proof of authority.There is a rule.Therefore they have authority.There is an ordinance.Therefore it applies.There is a regulation.Therefore you must comply.Maybe.But that is precisely what must be examined.The Liberty Dialogues begins somewhere different.What is the authority?What is the jurisdiction?What facts activate that jurisdiction?What is my status under the law?What obligation actually follows?What enforcement authority exists?And has each step been demonstrated without filling the gaps with presumption?That is how we begin taking apart Regulatory Saturation.Not by screaming that every regulation is unconstitutional.Not by refusing every law.Not by making conclusions before examining the evidence.We do something much more disciplined.We take one strand of the web at a time, and ...
    Show More Show Less
    8 mins
  • We, the People...

    We, the People...
    Aug 26 2026
    THE LONG TRAIN — WE DID THISWe have spent considerable time talking about a long train of abuses and usurpations.Government has grown.Federal power has grown.Administrative power has grown.Regulation has grown.Surveillance has grown.Taxation has grown.Spending has grown.Debt has grown.The number of laws, regulations, agencies, programs, mandates, licenses, permits, penalties, and governmental dependencies has grown.And Americans love asking:How did government become so powerful?Today I want to give you an answer you may not like.We did it.The People did it.Not because every American wanted bigger government.Not because there was some national meeting where we voted to surrender our freedoms.We did it through something far more ordinary.Ignorance.Apathy.Fear.Dependency.Convenience.Partisanship.And sometimes—cowardice.Start with ignorance.How many Americans have actually read the Constitution?How many know what powers belong to Congress?How many understand federalism?Separation of powers?Due process?The authority of their state?Their county?Their sheriff?How many can identify their county commissioners?Their state representative?Their prosecutor?How many understand the difference between a constitutional right and a government benefit?We created a government of limited and delegated powers—and then stopped learning what those limits were.You cannot defend a boundary you cannot identify.And government naturally occupied the territory the People abandoned.Then came apathy.We stopped participating.We complain about juries—and try to escape jury duty.We complain about politicians—but won’t run for office.We complain about local government—but don’t attend the meetings.We complain about legislation—but don’t read the bills.We complain about candidates—but often know almost nothing about them beyond the letter beside their name.Self-government requires something from us.And too often, we couldn’t be bothered.Then came partisanship.This may have been one of our greatest failures.We stopped asking:Should government possess this power?And started asking:Who is exercising it?When our party controlled government, we tolerated powers we would have condemned in the hands of the other party.Executive power was wonderful—when our president used it.Federal power was necessary—when our Congress exercised it.Government agencies were trustworthy—when they pursued people we disliked.And then the election changed.Suddenly we discovered constitutional limits again.But it was too late.Because the power we allowed our side to accumulate did not disappear when the other side took office.We taught government that our principles were negotiable.Then came fear.War.Terrorism.Crime.Economic collapse.Disease.Emergency.Every generation faced something it was told required just a little more governmental power.And frightened people repeatedly made the same bargain:Protect me, and I will surrender something.Maybe temporarily.Maybe just until the emergency ends.But government learned something about us.Fear makes free people willing to accept things they would reject under ordinary circumstances.Then came dependency.We wanted government to solve more problems.Educate us.Protect us.Subsidize us.Insure us.Finance us.Regulate our competitors.Protect our industries.Protect our jobs.Protect our retirement.Protect our businesses.Protect us from bad decisions.And every time we gave government another responsibility—we necessarily gave government additional power to perform it.We wanted the benefit without confronting the authority necessary to provide it.Eventually millions of Americans became financially dependent upon the very institution they were supposed to supervise.Then came convenience.Freedom requires responsibility.It requires risk.It requires tolerating other people’s choices.Government control frequently promises something easier.A rule.A program.A regulator.A license.A prohibition.Someone else responsible for deciding.And little by little we traded:responsibility for regulation.Then we surrendered our institutions.The jury became an inconvenience.The county became something most people couldn’t explain.The sheriff became merely another law-enforcement administrator.State government became another pipeline for federal money.Congress delegated enormous responsibilities to administrative agencies.And the citizen increasingly became a spectator.Then came perhaps the ugliest reason.Cowardice.How many times have Americans known something was wrong—and remained silent?Because they might lose a job.Lose a customer.Lose a friend.Be called a name.Be criticized online.Be investigated.Be embarrassed.Stand alone.We celebrate the courage of the Founders because their courage costs us nothing.But defending liberty in our own lives can cost something.And too often we chose comfort.Then we committed another enormous mistake.We outsourced the defense of freedom.We said:The courts will protect us.Congress will ...
    Show More Show Less
    10 mins
  • Long train of abuses?

    Long train of abuses?
    Aug 25 2026



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    10 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.