YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Hourly Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • What is action?

    What is action?
    Aug 13 2026
    ACTION BEGINS BY LISTENINGWhat does it mean to act?I hear the criticism.“All you do is talk.”“You make videos.”“You discuss the problems.”“But where is the action?”That’s a fair question.But I would ask you to consider something.Many people who watch these videos send me messages saying they’re praying for me and my family.They tell me to be careful.They express concern for my safety.Why?Because they understand that some of the things I am willing to say publicly are things many people are unwilling to say themselves.So apparently...words do matter.Apparently speaking can be an action.The question is whether those words accomplish anything.And that depends upon what happens next.Because action doesn’t begin when somebody marches somewhere.Action begins much earlier.Listening is action.Learning is action.Speaking is action.Sharing an idea is action.Teaching another person is action.And when those actions are directed toward a common objective, something else begins to happen.Understanding becomes consensus.And consensus can become collective action.Think about the frustration people feel today.Different people describe it differently.Different politics.Different experiences.Different theories about what went wrong.But underneath those differences there is a common angst.People feel that something fundamental has been lost.The ability to live your life.Protect your family.Enjoy your property.Pursue your livelihood.Exercise your natural rights.And sometimes simply...to be left alone.What if we stopped allowing every disagreement to divide us and instead found the common thread running through all of us?Not somebody’s guru.Not somebody’s theory.Not Republican versus Democrat.Not another national argument designed to consume every minute of our attention.Something much simpler.Freedom.Your life.Your family.Your property.Your community.And your right to live peacefully without government exceeding its lawful boundaries.What if we could agree on that?Then perhaps we could stop waiting for Washington to save us.And start looking closer to home.Our counties.Our communities.The places where we actually live.That is what we’re trying to build.Two new pages have been launched:Constitutional County.And:The Liberty Dialogues System.You’ll find them on Facebook, with expansion to X, TikTok, and other platforms.And I’m asking you to do something.Listen first.Don’t follow because I told you to.Listen.Examine the ideas.Ask whether they’re factually and truthfully based.Ask whether there is a common principle here that people with very different backgrounds can embrace.Then, if there is...act.Follow the pages.Share them.Send them to your family.Send them to your friends.Bring other people into the conversation.Our objective is extraordinary:871,987 followers within the next 87 days.Why?Because if nearly a million people can demonstrate that they share a basic understanding of freedom and are willing to organize around it...then we have something more powerful than another audience.We have a groundswell.And if we reach that objective, we intend to launch a major initiative designed to advance the cause of freedom—not simply nationally, but ultimately worldwide.Because freedom isn’t American.The desire to protect your family isn’t American.The desire to enjoy your property isn’t American.The desire to live your life without unnecessary interference isn’t American.Those things are human.So this isn’t about agreeing with me on everything.You shouldn’t.It isn’t about adopting another ideology.And it certainly isn’t about following another guru.It’s about finding the common thread.The basic premise upon which people who disagree about almost everything else can still stand together.If we can find that...If we can listen...If we can understand...If we can communicate...And if we can build consensus around something truthful...then we can begin acting together where action can actually make a difference.Locally.Go to ConstitutionalCounty.org.Find Constitutional County on Facebook.Find The Liberty Dialogues System.Follow them.Share them.And bring someone else with you.Don’t underestimate what you’re doing.Because action doesn’t always begin with doing something dramatic.Sometimes...action begins by listening.Then understanding.Then speaking.Then sharing.Then organizing.And finally...doing.Let’s see what happens when enough of us do those things together.And as always...May truth reign supreme. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    6 mins
  • 87 Days...

    87 Days...
    Aug 12 2026

    87 DAYS

    I’m Beau Johnson, creator of the Liberty Dialogues System, and I’ve got a significant announcement.

    Two new pages on FB have been launched.

    The Liberty Dialogues System.

    And:

    Constitutional County.

    Now here is an exciting challenge.

    Over the next 87 days, the goal is to acquire 871,987 followers on EACH page.

    Why?

    At the end of 87 days, we intend to launch a major new initiative.

    So consider doing something simple. Follow The Liberty Dialogues System.

    Follow Constitutional County.

    Then share them.

    Send them to your friends. Your family. Everyone who believes freedom still means something.

    And don’t think small.

    Think globally.

    Freedom matters to people in every country on Earth.

    Spread the word like a wildfire out West pushed by a great wind.

    87 days.871,987 people.Two pages.One extraordinary objective.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • The Purple House

    The Purple House
    Aug 12 2026
    If this video about a PURPLE house piques your curiosity, be sure to visit constitutionalcounty.org afterward.You own your home.No HOA. No historic district. No private covenant controlling its color.One Saturday, you decide:I’m painting my house purple.You buy the paint and begin.Then a zoning official arrives.“You can’t paint your house purple.”You ask:Why not?He cites a municipal regulation and orders you to stop, restore the approved color, or face fines.Now forget about purple for a moment.The real issue is simple.You own the property. Government has crossed that boundary and told you what you may do with it.Maybe government has lawful authority to do that.Maybe it doesn’t.The question is:Where is the boundary, and who determines whether government has crossed it?Let’s run the scenario two different ways.SCENARIO ONE:You challenge the order.You hire a lawyer.Five thousand dollars becomes ten thousand.There are motions.Hearings.Briefs.You lose.You appeal.More lawyers.More money.Meanwhile, fines accumulate.Perhaps the city threatens a lien.Two years pass.Then three.Then four.You’ve spent $60,000 fighting over what color you may paint your own house.Finally, the highest court you can realistically reach says:No. The ordinance stands.Now, a property right does not mean every regulation of property is unconstitutional.But assume for our hypothetical that this particular restriction really did exceed constitutional limits.That changes the question.You possessed the right.Government crossed the boundary.You used the remedy government provided.And four years later, the system still didn’t protect the right.So what did you actually have?A right without an effective remedy.SCENARIO NUMBER TWOSame homeowner.Same house.Same purple paint.Same zoning official.But this time, when the city threatens enforcement, the sheriff becomes involved.And the sheriff doesn’t simply take the homeowner’s side.He investigates.He reads the ordinance.He examines the authority under which the zoning official is acting.He considers the state constitution and the federal Constitution.He asks:What governmental interest justifies this interference?Does the ordinance actually authorize it?Does that authority extend this far?And suppose the sheriff concludes that enforcement would exceed the city’s lawful authority and violate a constitutionally protected property interest.Now something changes.The sheriff tells the city:I will not participate in enforcing this action, and I believe the constitutional boundary needs to be resolved before government proceeds against this citizen.That doesn’t make the sheriff a judge.And it doesn’t give him unlimited authority.The sheriff is bound by the Constitution and the law just like the zoning official.He cannot arrest or cite someone simply because he disagrees with that person’s interpretation of the Constitution.But suppose state law provides an applicable offense for the official conduct involved and the facts establish the required legal basis.The sheriff investigates.The lawful process is invoked.And suddenly the constitutional question is no longer four years downstream.It’s at the point of enforcement.The dispute reaches court.The city must defend the authority being exercised.And in our hypothetical, the court concludes:The city exceeded its lawful authority.The city backs down.The homeowner finishes painting his house purple.WHAT CHANGED?Not the Constitution.Not the homeowner.Not the ordinance.The remedy changed.In the first scenario:Government acts.The citizen suffers the consequence.Then the citizen spends years trying to undo it.In the second:Government attempts to act.Another lawful authority examines the boundary.Enforcement is challenged before the deprivation becomes irreversible.That is the counterweight.And the sheriff’s role isn’t:“I outrank the zoning official.”It is:“Before I participate in governmental force against this citizen, establish the lawful authority for what government is asking me to enforce.”If the authority exists, government proceeds.If it doesn’t, government should stop.That’s the principle.The purple house seems trivial.That’s what makes the example useful.Because today the question might be:Can I paint my house purple?Tomorrow it might be:Can government take my business?My property?My home?My liberty?And then the question becomes much more serious:If the Constitution establishes a boundary around government, where is the practical remedy when government crosses it?A right written on paper is important.But a right with an effective remedy is what makes the boundary real. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.