YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

About this listen

 YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • A Known Legal Duty

    A Known Legal Duty
    Mar 17 2026

    It is March 17. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    If we want to understand why good-faith belief matters in tax law, we must appreciate one word:

    willfulness.

    The Supreme Court has made clear that in criminal tax cases, willfulness means the voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty. That formulation was reaffirmed in Cheek v. United States, drawing from earlier cases including United States v. Bishop and United States v. Murdock.

    Now stop and think carefully.

    A known legal duty.

    Not an assumed duty.Not a socially repeated duty.Not a duty someone merely told you exists.

    A known legal duty.

    That matters because federal tax law does not operate honestly through slogans. It operates through definitions, terms of art, classifications, and jurisdictional structure. Before anyone can truly be said to know a duty, he must first understand what the statute actually means.

    What is meant by United States in the title?What is meant by State?How does includes operate under 26 U.S.C. §7701(c)?What class of person is being described?What activity gives rise to liability?What jurisdiction must exist before obligation can arise?

    Those are not insignificant questions. Those are the very questions that must be worked through if a legal duty is to be known rather than merely presumed.

    That is where the Liberty Dialogues becomes indispensable.

    Because the LD method does not begin with panic.It does not begin with enforcement.It begins with structure.

    Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.Enforcement.

    And if a person has sincerely worked through that sequence in an effort to determine what the law actually requires, that is not irrelevant. That goes directly to the issue of willfulness itself.

    This is why good faith matters. Because in tax law, the government does not merely say, “You acted.” It must prove that the person intentionally violated a duty he actually knew the law imposed.

    And as always…

    May truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Good Faith Beliefs

    Good Faith Beliefs
    Mar 17 2026

    It is March 16. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    Let’s discuss good faith beliefs.

    American law has long recognized that guilt is not supposed to arise from the mere existence of an act alone. The law has long required something more — a blameworthy state of mind. There is a maxim which says: actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea. This means: The act does not make a man guilty unless the mind is also guilty.

    The Supreme Court affirmed that principle in Morissette v. United States, explaining that criminal liability traditionally requires a culpable mental state and does not ordinarily rest on the bare doing of an act alone.

    That principle matters profoundly in tax law, because tax law is dense, technical, and full of defined terms. And when a body of law operates through definitions, classifications, and jurisdictional structure, the mind of the accused is relevant. What did he understand? What did he believe? What effort did he make to determine what the law actually required?

    That is why the Liberty Dialogues exists.

    Not as entertainment.Not as rebellion.Not as fantasy.

    But as a method by which a person can work through authority, jurisdiction, status, standing, obligation, and enforcement and form a documented and sincere understanding of the law.

    A good-faith belief is not a slogan.It is not outrage.It is not a position which says: “I don’t like the system.”

    It is a reasoned belief formed through honest inquiry.

    And that matters because the law itself has recognized that when a statute is technical and a person is sincerely trying to understand what it requires, that effort is legally significant.

    In this series, we are no longer merely discussing definitions in the abstract or concretely. We are showing why those definitions, and the jurisdiction they imply, become part of the foundation of a genuine good-faith belief.

    And as always…

    May truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Adios, Gurus and Attorneys

    Adios, Gurus and Attorneys
    Mar 14 2026
    It is March 14. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.I tend to approach life rather simply. I try to deal with what we know while recognizing that it is often what we do not know that causes us the greatest harm.So the real question becomes this:How do we arrive at a clear understanding of what we need to know right now in order to move forward?To do that, we must ask questions that lead us to information — information that gives us a clear path forward.And how we arrive at that path is especially vital in the legal realm.The Liberty Dialogues provides a method and an approach that allows us to arrive at that destination.And when that method is combined with AI or ChatGPT, something very powerful happens.We can arrive at answers that are structured, logical, and grounded in a constitutional framework — answers that help us prevail rather than wander through confusion.But there is a problem in the information world today.There are many avenues where people seek legal understanding.There are gurus who charge thousands of dollars an hour for their advice.There are websites filled with supposed legal information.But much of that information is not comprehensively grounded, and in many cases it is simply wrong.So we have to be very deliberate.Let me give you an example.The other day I saw one of these so-called gurus post a legal question about the Fourteenth Amendment on social media.He asked the question and then used AI to arrive at the answer.Now the answer itself was not entirely wrong.But it was not complete.And because it was incomplete, it failed to consider the full legal ramifications of the issue and how it might affect someone using that information.And this is not just about the Fourteenth Amendment.This problem exists with any legal question.We must understand what we do not know.And that is precisely why the Liberty Dialogues is so vital.You see, the Liberty Dialogues can completely eliminate the need for these self-proclaimed gurus.No longer do we need to pay two thousand dollars or four thousand dollars for someone to give us advice that the Liberty Dialogues can help us obtain ourselves.My intention is very simple.I want people to obtain the Liberty Dialogues.I want them to obtain the SOU for You package.And then I want them to use AI properly within the Liberty Dialogues framework.When we do that, something remarkable happens.We no longer need the gurus.And we begin to realize that many lawyers — who either do not understand the law or who would never tell us the truth about the law even if they did — become far less necessary in our lives.When we remove that dependency, something powerful emerges.We gain peace of mind.Because now we can begin to map out our own strategies.We can examine issues through the Liberty Dialogues order:Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.And we can understand the power of presumption — the silent force that moves the legal system forward unless it is challenged intelligently.Now, to demonstrate this point, I am going to send an email to everyone.In that email I will attach the exact question asked by the guru.I will show you the answer that AI gave him.And then I will show you the same question asked again, but this time framed within the Liberty Dialogues context using ChatGPT.When you see the two answers side by side, you will immediately recognize the difference.You will see the power of the Liberty Dialogues.This is not just information.This is an arsenal.This is intellectual weaponry.And frankly, it should exist in every home across the fruited plain.Every American should have the Liberty Dialogues.Even the gurus themselves — if they were honest with their clients and with themselves — should be using the Liberty Dialogues in their work.But more importantly, when you have the Liberty Dialogues, you gain the ability to operate independently.My goal is to replicate within you the same process that I use.So that anyone who possesses the Liberty Dialogues can do independently what I do by myself.That is extraordinarily powerful.But there is one final piece to the puzzle.Once you understand the Liberty Dialogues…Once you understand the structure of authority, jurisdiction, status, standing, and obligation…And once you begin using AI within that framework…You must still establish something critically important.You must establish your good-faith belief about the law.Because ultimately, if you ever find yourself in a courtroom, what matters is not only what the law says — but what you believed the law said and why.This is why StatementOfUnderstanding.com is so vital.The Statement of Understanding allows you to document your reasoning, your research, and your conclusions in a clear and organized form.It creates evidence of your good-faith belief.And that evidence can become extremely important in a court of law.When this final step is completed, something changes.You sleep better at night.You operate during the day with greater ...
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.