It’s March 7th. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Tomorrow I will host a call at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time about the Liberty Dialogues and how to use them with AI and ChatGPT.

These calls have been extremely informative, and the feedback from those who have attended has been outstanding. People are beginning to see that if we want any realistic chance of prevailing in our personal legal matters, we must first understand the existing authoritarian process.

We cannot navigate a system we do not understand.

If you have the SOU for You package and would like to attend tomorrow’s call, send me an email with the subject line “Liberty Dialogues”, and I will send you the call credentials.

Also, a quick note: a few people reported that the payment processing on statementofunderstanding.com was not functioning properly. The programmer is currently reviewing and refining the system. If you experienced problems earlier, please try again.

The SOU program and the documentation of our good faith beliefs is an essential component to defeat the element of willfulness in any proceeding. To be forewarned is to be forearmed. And one more important point.

Inside the Statement of Understanding program, there is a document about presumption that is extremely powerful.

If we fail to understand presumption, we fail to understand how the system actually works.

The system operates almost like a conveyor belt. People move through it one after another, and a rubber stamp of presumption is placed on each person automatically—often leading to an outcome that favors the government from the very beginning.

Understanding that mechanism is the first step toward dealing with it intelligently.

I hope to see many of you on the call tomorrow.

Its March 7. Welcome to yestohellwith.com. Imagine something for a moment.

Imagine if the men and women who sat in the United States Congress lived their public lives the way Franciscan monks live theirs.

Not in robes.Not in monasteries.

But in spirit.

The Franciscans, founded by Francis of Assisi, built their lives around a few simple principles:

Humility.Service.Simplicity.And devotion to something higher than themselves.

They took vows of poverty so that wealth could never become their master.They rejected power so that power could never corrupt their purpose.They lived among the people so that they would never forget who they served.

Now imagine if the same spirit guided those who sit in the halls of Congress.

Imagine if every congressman and senator approached public office not as a career, not as a ladder of power, not as a pathway to wealth—but as a solemn act of service.

Imagine if they entered Washington with humility rather than ambition.

Imagine if their goal was not to expand government power, but to protect the freedom and dignity of the people who placed them there.

Imagine if they lived simply, so they could never be bought.

Imagine if their loyalty was not to party, not to donors, not to the machinery of Washington—but to the Constitution and to the people whose liberty that Constitution was written to preserve.

The Franciscan monk asks himself a question every day:

“How may I serve?”

If that question echoed through the chambers of Congress, something remarkable would happen.

The endless pursuit of power would give way to the discipline of responsibility.

The temptation of wealth would give way to the dignity of restraint.

The culture of political gamesmanship would give way to a culture of stewardship.

And perhaps most importantly, the American people would once again see something they have not seen in a very long time:

Representatives who remember that public office is not a privilege to exploit, but a trust to honor.

There is an ancient principle taught long before modern politics ever existed:

“The last shall be first, and the first shall be last.”

In other words, true leadership begins with humility.

The greatest among us are not those who rise above the people, but those who kneel to serve them.

Imagine if the leaders of this nation understood that principle.

Imagine if they did not compete to be first in power, first in privilege, first in influence.

Imagine if instead they competed to be first in service… first in sacrifice… first in fidelity to the Constitution they swore to defend.

Because the greatest leaders in history were never those who sought power for its own sake.

They were those who understood that power is only legitimate when it is exercised in humility and in service to others.

St. Francis understood that eight hundred years ago.

Imagine what America might look like if those who governed it remembered the same truth today.

Because a republic does not fail when its leaders lack intelligence.

A republic fails when its leaders forget that they are servants of the people, not masters of them.

And perhaps the greatest reform Congress could ever undertake would not be written in legislation.

It would be written in character.

A character that says:

“I did not come here to rule.”

“I came here to serve.”

And in doing so, they might rediscover the timeless truth that built every free society worth preserving:

Those who humble themselves in service will ultimately lead…and those who seek to lead for their own sake will eventually fall behind.

It is March 7. Welcome to yestohellwith.com

Have you ever noticed the phrase that echoes through the halls of Congress?

“My good friend on the other side of the aisle.”

You hear it again and again.

“My friend from the other party.”“My good friend across the aisle.”

It sounds polite.It sounds civil.It sounds like statesmanship.

But to many Americans, it sounds like something else entirely.

Because while they stand there praising their “good friends,” the American people are watching something very different unfold.

They are watching their Constitution ignored.They are watching debt explode into the trillions.They are watching laws written that no citizen ever voted on.They are watching agencies rule where legislatures once debated.They are watching a republic slowly replaced by administrative management.

And through it all, the language remains the same.

“My good friend on the other side of the aisle.”

Isn’t that curious?

Because the oath these men and women take is not to their friends.It is not to their party.It is not to the machinery of Washington.

Their oath is to the Constitution of the United States.

And their office is not meant to serve each other.

It is meant to serve the people.

Yet what Americans increasingly see is something different.

Deals made behind closed doors.Compromises not about principle, but about power.Negotiations not about liberty, but about management.

The representatives of the people speak warmly of their friendships with one another… while the very document they swore to defend is treated as flexible, negotiable, and secondary.

Think about that irony.

The only friendship that truly matters in a constitutional republic is the relationship between the representative and the Constitution they swore to uphold.

If that bond is broken, all the politeness in the world means nothing.

And if I were a member of Congress or the Senate, I would never stand there and say “my good friend on the other side of the aisle.”

In fact, I doubt I would even say that about members of my own party.

I would look at every member of that chamber and judge them by one standard alone:

Their fidelity to their oath.

Did they defend the Constitution?Did they protect its limits?Did they honor the structure of liberty it was written to preserve?

If they did, they would earn my respect.

If they did not—if they twisted it, ignored it, or stretched it into meanings that the Founders never intended—then I would not call them my friend.

I would call them what they are:

An enemy of the Constitution.

An enemy of the American people.

An enemy of freedom itself.

Because in a constitutional republic, loyalty to the Constitution must come before loyalty to colleagues, before loyalty to party, and certainly before loyalty to political convenience.

So when Americans hear that phrase—“my good friend on the other side of the aisle”—many no longer hear civility.

They hear a quiet confession.

A confession that loyalty inside the club has become stronger than loyalty to the charter of liberty that created the office in the first place.

But the American people did not send representatives to Washington to make friends.

They sent them there to defend the Constitution.

And if those who hold office forget that…

Then it is time for the people to remind them.

Because in America, the Constitution is not negotiable.

And no friendship in Washington should ever come at the expense of liberty.