Short on details

Interesting format to structure a book around. Resulting in a read that fell short. I’ll be the first to admit, this is most likely heavily influenced on my own personal preference. To go through a 101 questions resulted in having to listen to many questions I just had no interest in. Some answered themselves while others felt random. This caused a diversity in my interest in the book at times. At times I was hooked, the case study so interesting and explained in thorough details. While others answers short and the case study felt it was forced. The amount of research is undeniably significant and impressive. The number of cases exposed me to new players in this field. Some just didn’t seem relevant and purely used just to attempt to answer the question. The author clearly wanted to not focus on one particular story to long. This once again resulted in periods of interest and others of boredom. Having less questions would increase the quality of the questions covered. Resulting in hearing less cases but you’d hear them in more detail. With the amount of books available and the fact I’d assume all the questions you actually wanted to know, you most likely answered yourself. I’d choose a different read.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!