The Non-Prophets cover art

The Non-Prophets

By: Atheist Community of Austin
Listen for free

  • Summary

  • And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Copyright Atheist Community of Austin
    Show More Show Less
Episodes
  • Family Values or Hypocrisy? IVF Bill Fallout

    Family Values or Hypocrisy? IVF Bill Fallout
    Jul 3 2024
    Senate GOP blocks bill to guarantee access to IVF nationwide

    CNN Politics, By Clare Foran and Ted Barrett, on June 13, 2024

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/13/politics/senate-ivf-bill-vote/index.html

    The recent Senate vote blocking a bill to secure nationwide access to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has sparked a heated debate, exposing deep political and ethical divisions. The bill aimed to protect IVF regardless of state legislature whims, but the GOP's surprising decision to vote against it has raised questions about their motivations. Cindy reported on the story, revealing insights from a CNN article. The GOP's stance has been labeled as political theater, with accusations that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is using the vote to force Republicans into a corner, making their rejections ammunition for the upcoming Democratic campaigns. Cindy argues that this tactic is effective, forcing the GOP to either support beneficial legislation or face political repercussions.

    Jimmy adds that the debate is both political theater and a genuine issue, pointing out inconsistencies in the GOP's stance on family values. He highlights the irony of the party that supports medical coverage for treatments like Viagra and hair replacement but opposes IVF, a procedure that could bring joy and fulfillment to many families. Both Cindy and Jimmy agree that the Senate's decision reflects broader societal and political dynamics, with significant implications for reproductive rights and healthcare access.

    The debate also touches on the role of corporate interests, particularly insurance companies, in influencing legislative decisions. Jimmy suggests that insurance companies may be lobbying against coverage for IVF to control costs, a strategy that ultimately hurts families seeking fertility treatments. Cindy emphasizes the broader impact on states, particularly those with restrictive reproductive laws, predicting that such states could become medical deserts, driving away healthcare providers and companies, and exacerbating inequities for the poorest residents.

    The conversation delves into the ethical and moral dimensions of IVF, contrasting the GOP's pro-life stance with their opposition to fertility treatments. Cindy and Jimmy highlight the need for a comprehensive discussion on reproductive rights, encompassing more than just abortion. They argue that the Senate vote is a crucial moment for highlighting the broader issues at stake and the need for consistent policies that truly support family values.

    As the debate continues, it becomes clear that the implications of the Senate's decision extend far beyond IVF, touching on fundamental questions about healthcare, corporate influence, and the role of government in supporting or hindering access to medical treatments. The outcome of this debate will have lasting effects on families across the country, particularly those in states with restrictive reproductive laws, and will shape the future of healthcare policy in the US.

    #ReproductiveRights #HealthcareAccess #FamilyValues

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.26.2 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jimmy Jr., and Cindy Plaza

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • Moses in the Classroom? Louisiana vs Constitution

    Moses in the Classroom? Louisiana vs Constitution
    Jul 1 2024
    New law requires all Louisiana public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments

    AP News, By Sara Cline, on June 19, 2024

    https://apnews.com/article/louisiana-ten-commandments-displayed-classrooms-571a2447906f7bbd5a166d53db005a62

    In a foolish move that has reignited the perennial debate between church and state, Louisiana has mandated that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom. Governor Jeff Landry hails this decision as a respectful nod to one of history’s original lawmakers, Moses, but the reaction has been far from unanimous. Opponents are already preparing for what promises to be a fierce constitutional showdown. This controversial legislation brings to the forefront a critical question: are we witnessing a pivotal moment in history or merely another episode of church versus state drama?

    The decision has deep roots in a complex interplay of politics, religion, and education. Governor Landry and the bill's co-author, Lauren Ventril, argue that the Ten Commandments are a fundamental historical document. However, critics see this as an insidious attempt to impose religious beliefs on a diverse student population. They predict that the Supreme Court, which ruled a similar Kentucky law unconstitutional in 1980, will ultimately strike down this law as well. Yet, the current Supreme Court's composition and recent decisions suggest a nuanced and unpredictable battle ahead.

    Public reaction varies significantly, reflecting broader societal divisions. Supporters of the law believe it reinforces moral values and historical awareness. Opponents, however, argue that it undermines the principle of separation of church and state, making non-Christian students feel marginalized and unsafe. Organizations like the ACLU and the Freedom from Religion Foundation are gearing up to challenge this law, emphasizing the potential for significant constitutional implications.

    The law's passage in Louisiana might also embolden other states to propose similar legislation. Historically, such bills have failed, but the current polarized political climate could see a resurgence of efforts to integrate religious symbols into public spaces. The potential ripple effects are vast, potentially transforming how public education is perceived in terms of inclusivity and neutrality.

    Beyond the legal battles, there are practical concerns. Will teachers be required to interpret these religious texts, and if so, how? How will schools handle objections from students and parents of various faiths? And what precedent does this set for other religious or ideological displays in public schools?

    As we delve deeper into this issue, it is essential to consider the broader implications. This law raises questions about religious freedom, the role of education, and the future of public spaces as inclusive environments. The coming months will likely see a flurry of legal challenges, public debates, and possibly even more states attempting similar legislative maneuvers.

    #SeparationOfChurchAndState #PublicSchools #TenCommandments

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.26.1 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jimmy Jr., and Cindy Plaza

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • The Tale of Poland's EU-Protected Croissant: A Flaky Legend

    The Tale of Poland's EU-Protected Croissant: A Flaky Legend
    Jun 29 2024
    The story behind Poland's EU-protected croissant

    RTE, By Charlotte Ryan, on June 11, 2024

    https://www.rte.ie/lifestyle/travel/2024/0611/1454133-the-story-behind-polands-eu-protected-croissant/

    In a picturesque recounting of St. Martin's Croissant, the narrative unfolds in Pnan, Poland, a city not merely dubbed "Potato Land" but also celebrated for its hidden gastronomic gem, the St. Martin's Croissant. This delectable pastry, granted EU protected food status in 2008, traces its origins back to 1891. Inspired by the charitable acts of St. Martin, who famously shared his cloak with a beggar, the croissant was born from a baker's post-sermon inspiration to craft a treat symbolizing generosity and community sharing.

    The story resonates deeply, highlighting the enduring impact of selflessness and compassion across centuries. Locals proudly uphold the tradition, viewing the croissant not just as a culinary delight but as a testament to their cultural heritage and values. The EU protection ensures that its name and authenticity are preserved, guarding against imitations and upholding its historical significance.

    The conversation around St. Martin's Croissant sparks reflections on the broader themes of morality, religious attribution, and cultural identity. It prompts questions about the nature of sainthood and the attribution of goodness to divine influence versus individual conscience. Despite differing views on religious canonization, there's a consensus on the universal appeal of kindness and altruism embedded in the croissant's story.

    As the dialogue explores the implications of cultural designation and protection, parallels are drawn to similar efforts worldwide. The EU's initiative underscores the importance of safeguarding cultural icons amidst globalization's homogenizing forces. It also raises discussions about whether other nations should adopt similar measures to protect their culinary and cultural heritage.

    The multifaceted discussion reveals how food can serve as a conduit for preserving and celebrating communal values. It challenges perceptions about identity and authenticity in an interconnected world, where local traditions can thrive alongside global influences. St. Martin's Croissant emerges not just as a delicious treat but as a symbol of resilience, community pride, and the enduring power of a good story.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.25.4 featuring Scott Dickie, Aaron Jensen, Jason Friedman and Helen Greene

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
Politics & Government
Show More Show Less

What listeners say about The Non-Prophets

Average Customer Ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com.au reviews

Amazon Reviews
No Reviews are Available
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.