• Should Collectors Change the Validation Notices Sent into Pennsylvania?

  • Mar 4 2019
  • Length: 13 mins
  • Podcast

Should Collectors Change the Validation Notices Sent into Pennsylvania?

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • Debt collectors face an historic onslaught of FDCPA cases in Pennsylvania (and to a lesser extent New Jersey), all of which allege that statutory language in collection letters which tracks the FDCPA somehow violates the law.  The Courts in these cases take the position that a consumer must be apprised that a dispute must be in writing to be effective, even though this position is contrary to the plain language of the FDCPA and rulings by the Second, Fourth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal.  This issue has been addressed extensively in InsideARM: 

    http://www.insidearm.com/news/00044725-22m-settlement-proposed-fcra-case-pulling/

    http://www.insidearm.com/news/00044669-open-letter-cfpb-1692g-issues-within-thir/

    In this episode of the Debt Collection Drill podcast, attorneys John Rossman and Mike Poncin directly address whether debt collectors should change notices sent into Pennsylvania and also discuss the impact of the settlement in the Crunch v. Marks decision along with the recent California out-of-statute disclosure.
    Show More Show Less
Show More Show Less

What listeners say about Should Collectors Change the Validation Notices Sent into Pennsylvania?

Average Customer Ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com.au reviews

Amazon Reviews
No Reviews are Available
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.