• Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17

  • Sep 15 2017
  • Length: 1 hr and 39 mins
  • Podcast

Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17

  • Summary

  • Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at

    1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefits the researcher 3. How transparency benefits the public 4. How transparency addresses the limitations of traditional peer review

    Music: www.bensound.com


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show More Show Less

What listeners say about Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17

Average Customer Ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.