• Appeal Raises New Questions in Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions
    Dec 13 2024
    Alex Murdaugh’s defense team has filed a 132-page appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court, seeking to overturn his convictions for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Central to the appeal are allegations of misconduct by court clerk Becky Hill and claims that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of Murdaugh’s financial crimes to be presented to the jury.

    The disgraced attorney, once a prominent figure in South Carolina’s legal world, is serving life in prison after being found guilty of the brutal killings. Murdaugh has consistently denied committing the murders, including during his emotional testimony at trial.

    Defense attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian argue that the integrity of the trial was compromised by Hill’s alleged behavior. They cite testimony from jurors and other witnesses claiming Hill encouraged jurors to closely scrutinize Murdaugh’s testimony, implying his guilt. According to the appeal, Hill suggested that a guilty verdict would enhance the sales of her book about the trial.

    “Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one — powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved — is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law,” the defense wrote in the appeal.

    Earlier this year, Judge Jean Toal determined that Hill’s actions, while “foolish” and motivated by publicity, did not actively change jurors’ minds. However, Murdaugh’s lawyers contend that the appearance of impropriety is sufficient grounds for overturning the convictions.

    The appeal also challenges the admissibility of evidence related to Murdaugh’s financial crimes, which prosecutors argued provided a motive for the killings. The trial judge, Clifton Newman, allowed the jury to hear six days of testimony about Murdaugh’s theft from clients and his law firm, reasoning that it demonstrated his “desperation” to divert attention from his financial misdeeds.

    The defense maintains that the inclusion of financial crime evidence was prejudicial and unnecessary, writing, “The State was improperly permitted to introduce evidence of Murdaugh’s alleged financial crimes solely to impugn his character to bolster its otherwise weak case.”

    Physical evidence linking Murdaugh to the murders was minimal, the appeal asserts. The weapons used in the crimes were never found, and only small amounts of blood were detected on Murdaugh’s clothes. Defense attorneys also questioned the reliability of forensic evidence presented during the trial, including an investigator’s unrecorded experiments with an iPhone to support the prosecution’s theory about Maggie’s phone.

    Prosecutors have yet to respond to the appeal. The South Carolina Supreme Court will review the arguments, along with extensive materials from the six-week trial. A hearing is not expected for several months.

    Even if the convictions are overturned, Murdaugh is unlikely to regain his freedom. He is serving an additional 40-year sentence for financial crimes after pleading guilty to embezzling millions from clients and his law firm. As part of his plea agreement, Murdaugh waived his right to appeal those convictions.

    The case has captivated public attention due to Murdaugh’s once-powerful family’s influence in South Carolina’s legal community and the shocking allegations of betrayal and violence.

    #AlexMurdaugh #MurderTrial #LegalAppeal #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #BeckyHill

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • Former Kentucky Sheriff Claims Judge Operated Brothel Amid Murder Trial
    Dec 13 2024
    The high-profile murder trial of former Kentucky sheriff Shawn Stines has taken a shocking turn as his defense team builds a case alleging that slain U.S. District Judge Kevin Mullins was involved in illicit activities within his chambers. Stines, who was charged with fatally shooting Mullins in his chambers, claims the killing was tied to revelations of corruption and misconduct.

    The accusations against Mullins were first brought to light during the criminal investigation of former deputy sheriff Ben Fields. Fields was convicted earlier this year on charges of rape, sodomy, perjury, and tampering with a prisoner monitoring device. As part of that investigation, witness Sabrina Adkins alleged in a police interview that Mullins exchanged legal leniency for sexual favors and allowed his chambers to be used for sexual misconduct.

    Adkins detailed her claims in an audio recording obtained by NewsNation. "He does have some videotapes of some stuff in the judge’s chambers," she said. "Just with girls, sexual and stuff. I’ve seen one partly." She further alleged that Fields coerced her into performing sexual acts in the judge’s chambers, promising to tamper with her ankle monitor to keep her out of jail.

    These allegations form the backbone of a civil lawsuit Adkins filed in January 2022. In the lawsuit, she accused Mullins and Fields of using the judge’s chambers as a location to carry out assaults and other illicit activities. “There were no cameras,” the lawsuit stated, describing the chambers as a secluded area exploited by those in positions of power.

    Three days before the fatal shooting, Stines, a longtime friend of Mullins, was deposed in Adkins’ lawsuit. His attorney, Jeremy Bartley, has indicated that Adkins’ allegations and the findings from Fields’ case are central to the defense. “This is a large story. It’s a story that, in some ways, is difficult to tell,” Bartley said during a recent court hearing. He described the accusations against Mullins as “crucial” to understanding Stines’ actions.

    Adkins’ lawsuit further alleges that Fields used his authority as a deputy sheriff to intimidate her and others into compliance. The chambers, she claims, became a hub for illegal activities due to their lack of surveillance. “Fields assaulted me there more than once, and Mullins knew,” Adkins wrote in her lawsuit.

    Fields’ conviction earlier this year has already exposed significant corruption within the local justice system. Now, with the murder of Mullins, the spotlight has intensified on the alleged abuse of power by judicial officials. The revelations have sparked national discussions about systemic corruption and the unchecked authority of public servants.

    Stines remains in custody, and his trial is expected to delve deeper into the disturbing allegations surrounding Judge Mullins. The case continues to draw national attention, as it raises broader questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the lengths to which individuals might go to expose corruption.

    #CorruptionScandal #KentuckyNews #JudgeMisconduct #ShockingRevelations #JusticeSystemReform #HighProfileTrial #BreakingNews

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    11 mins
  • Donna Adelson Returns to Court with New Legal Team, Trial Proposed for June
    Dec 12 2024
    Donna Adelson, accused of orchestrating the 2014 murder-for-hire of Florida State University law professor Dan Markel, appeared in court with her new defense team after her trial was delayed by conflict-of-interest issues. The appearance marked her first since a September postponement of the high-profile case.

    Accompanied by her new attorneys, former Circuit Judge Jackie Fulford and Tallahassee lawyer Josh Zelman, Adelson appeared before Leon Circuit Judge Stephen Everett. Both attorneys assured the court there were no conflicts of interest in their representation. Adelson’s previous legal team had been disqualified due to conflicts involving her son Charlie Adelson, who is serving a life sentence for organizing the murder.

    Fulford and Zelman took over the case in October and have begun addressing the substantial legal hurdles that come with such a transition. Fulford, drawing on her experience as a circuit judge and interim state attorney, expressed confidence in their ability to prepare for the trial despite limited access to discovery materials. “The state attorney’s office has agreed to provide us with electronic copies of all deposition transcripts,” Zelman noted.

    Adelson, who appeared in a purple jail jumpsuit and spoke only to her attorneys, faces charges of first-degree murder, conspiracy, and solicitation. Prosecutors allege she hired hitmen through her son Charlie Adelson to kill Dan Markel during a contentious custody dispute involving her grandchildren.

    During the hearing, Fulford proposed a trial window between June 16 and July 2, noting that all parties involved, including witnesses, could be available during that time. Judge Everett emphasized the importance of setting a firm trial date, citing the logistical complexities of moving prisoners and ensuring the presence of witnesses. “When that trial date is set, it is going to be firm,” he stated.

    The court set the next case management conference for February 11, when discovery is expected to be completed and deadlines for trial preparation finalized. Local attorney Don Pumphrey commented on the challenges of picking up a case at this stage, likening it to “painting in the blind.” However, he acknowledged the strengths of the new legal team, describing Fulford as a “strategist” and a strong choice for the defense.

    The case remains one of significant public interest, with Adelson being one of five individuals arrested in connection with Markel’s murder. Her son Charlie Adelson and three others are already serving prison sentences, leaving her as the final defendant to face trial.

    Judge Everett also addressed any potential conflicts arising from Fulford’s prior judicial role presiding over Markel probate matters. After reviewing the matter, he found no issues that would interfere with her representation.

    The court’s focus now shifts to ensuring all materials are handed over and preparations are completed in time for the June trial window, bringing the case closer to resolution after a decade of legal battles and public scrutiny.

    #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #Tallahassee #TrueCrime #MurderTrial

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
  • Sean 'Diddy' Combs Faces Sexual Assault Allegation from Former Security Worker
    Dec 12 2024
    A man accusing music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs of sexual assault has spoken out for the first time, detailing the alleged events from one of Combs' exclusive White Parties in East Hampton, New York. The man, referred to as "John Doe," shared his story anonymously with CNN, describing the alleged 2007 incident that has profoundly impacted his life.

    “The full gravity of it lives with me to this day,” Doe stated. “It affects every single thing you do for the rest of your life.”

    Doe claims he was working as a security guard at Combs' estate during the high-profile White Party, a series of events hosted by the music producer between 1998 and 2009. According to his civil suit, filed in October, Doe alleges that Combs provided him with drinks laced with GHB and ecstasy, leaving him feeling “extremely ill” and unable to stand.

    He recounted to CNN that after consuming the second drink, he initially believed Combs was expressing concern for his well-being. However, he claims Combs pushed him into a stationary SUV and sexually assaulted him.

    “The two drinks felt more like 15,” he said. “It was just an amazing level of incapacitation that I had never experienced before, and I felt powerless.”

    (GRAPHIC CONTENT COMING)

    Doe described the alleged assault as “incredibly painful” and said he was “screaming” during the incident. He added, “It was abusive beyond belief.”

    The lawsuit also claims a well-known celebrity witnessed the assault and reacted with amusement, though Doe did not name the individual.

    In the aftermath of the alleged attack, Doe reported the incident to his supervisor at the security firm. He claims the supervisor promised to address the matter with Combs but that he was subsequently blacklisted from the company.

    The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault, which Doe says has affected his personal and professional life. “It impacts everything, including my relationships,” he said.

    When questioned by CNN, several discrepancies in Doe's story were noted. The lawsuit originally stated the assault occurred in 2006, but Doe later said it was in 2007. Additionally, while Doe told CNN the incident affected his marriage, the lawsuit claims he was never married.

    Doe’s attorney attributed the errors to a rush to file the complaint and has since amended it with the court.

    Combs' representatives declined to comment on the allegations when approached by CNN. The Daily Beast also reached out for a statement but has yet to receive a response.

    The accusations come as Sean “Diddy” Combs faces increased scrutiny over allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse, with multiple lawsuits and claims surfacing in recent months.

    This case is being closely watched as it unfolds, adding to the growing number of high-profile allegations within the entertainment industry.

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • Scott Peterson’s Bid for Freedom: Judge Dismisses Motion to Seal Case Proceedings
    Dec 11 2024
    Scott Peterson, convicted in 2004 of murdering his pregnant wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Conner, made a virtual court appearance in his ongoing efforts to overturn his convictions. Peterson joined the San Mateo County Superior Court hearing remotely from Mule Creek State Prison, where he is serving a life sentence without parole.

    The Los Angeles Innocence Project, which began representing Peterson earlier this year, has filed three motions aimed at exoneration. On Tuesday, the court addressed the first motion: a request to seal proceedings to protect potential witnesses' identities. Judge Anne-Christine Massullo dismissed the motion, clearing the way for future public scrutiny of the case.

    Peterson’s legal team argues that key evidence from the original investigation was either mishandled or overlooked. "There are significant questions about the evidence used to convict Mr. Peterson," said a spokesperson for the Los Angeles Innocence Project.

    The next motion hearing, scheduled for May, will focus on post-conviction DNA testing of evidence connected to a burned van. The van, located near the Petersons' Modesto home around the time of Laci’s disappearance in December 2002, contained a blood-stained mattress. A former fire investigator claims the circumstances surrounding this evidence were not thoroughly investigated.

    In July, the court will hear the third motion, which seeks post-trial discovery. This includes details about a burglary that occurred across the street from the Peterson home at the time of Laci’s disappearance, a missing watch belonging to Laci, and documentation from witness interviews.

    Peterson’s case was transferred to San Mateo County for the original trial due to extensive pre-trial publicity in Stanislaus County. In 2004, Peterson was convicted after the remains of Laci and Conner washed ashore in the San Francisco Bay months after being reported missing. The trial revealed troubling details, including Peterson’s affair with Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey. Frey testified that Peterson had told her he was a widower, even as his wife was still missing.

    The California Supreme Court overturned Peterson's death sentence in 2020, ruling that potential jurors were wrongly dismissed for their views on the death penalty. However, his convictions for murder were upheld. In 2021, Peterson was resentenced to life in prison without parole. A 2022 motion for a new trial, based on allegations of juror misconduct, was denied.

    As Peterson’s legal battle continues, questions about the evidence and investigation remain central to his defense. The upcoming hearings could significantly impact the case’s trajectory, as Peterson’s team seeks to challenge the narrative that led to his convictions nearly two decades ago.

    #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #TrueCrime #InnocenceProject #LegalBattles #JusticeSystem #CourtUpdate

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com


    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • Retrial for Karen Read Delayed as Court Reviews Evidence and Expert Testimony
    Dec 11 2024
    The retrial of Karen Read, accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, has been delayed following a joint motion from both the defense and prosecution. The delay, granted by Judge Beverly Cannone, allows additional time for both sides to prepare as they navigate disputes over key evidence and expert testimony. Read, 44, is charged with second-degree murder and related offenses in connection with the January 2022 death of O’Keefe. His body was discovered in the snow outside a Canton home after a night of drinking. Prosecutors allege that Read struck O’Keefe with her SUV and left him to die, while her defense argues she is the victim of a cover-up involving law enforcement and others. The retrial was initially scheduled to begin in January 2025. Both parties, however, requested the delay, proposing an April 1, 2025, start date. In their motion, attorneys cited the need for "adequate time" to prepare due to new evidence and expert analysis that will be presented. Judge Cannone approved the motion and indicated that final scheduling details would be discussed at a Dec. 12 hearing. This hearing will also address the defense's attempt to introduce testimony from Dr. Marie Russell, a veterinarian who testified in the first trial. Dr. Russell has argued that O’Keefe’s injuries could be attributed to dog bites rather than being struck by a vehicle. Prosecutors are challenging her qualifications as an expert witness, with a Daubert hearing set to assess whether her testimony meets the legal standards for relevance and reliability. Read’s defense continues to assert her innocence, alleging she has been framed in a conspiracy involving law enforcement and others. Her attorney, David Yannetti, has pointed to perceived irregularities in the investigation, including inconsistencies in how damage to Read’s SUV was documented. “There is overwhelming evidence that Karen Read is the victim of a miscarriage of justice,” Yannetti said. “We are confident the retrial will expose the truth.” The first trial, which ended in a mistrial in July 2024, saw jurors deadlocked on a manslaughter charge but reportedly leaning toward acquittal on more serious counts. Read's legal team has since appealed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to dismiss some of the charges, arguing that the jury's findings in the first trial support her claims of innocence. Prosecutors maintain that Read acted with reckless disregard for O’Keefe’s safety. They contend that she struck him with her SUV and failed to seek help, leaving him to succumb to the elements. Efforts to strengthen their case in the retrial have included requests for additional forensic testing of Read’s SUV and obtaining recordings from interviews involving Read and her family. Judge Cannone recently denied a prosecution request to access phone records from Read’s parents but approved their request to analyze unedited interview recordings. Complicating matters further is a civil lawsuit filed by O’Keefe’s family against Read and the establishments where the couple had been drinking before his death. A judge has paused depositions and discovery in the civil case until the conclusion of the criminal retrial. As both sides prepare for the upcoming trial, the Dec. 12 hearing will play a crucial role in determining the scope of evidence and testimony that can be presented. The retrial remains a focal point for those closely watching the legal battle, which has raised questions about the intersection of law enforcement, justice, and personal relationships. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #Retrial #JusticeSystem #LegalNews #MassachusettsCrime #CourtUpdates Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins
  • Man Questioned in Slaying of UnitedHealthcare CEO Linked to Anti-Capitalist Ideologies
    Dec 10 2024
    A 26-year-old tech whiz and Ivy League graduate is being questioned in the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, who was shot outside the New York Hilton Midtown last week in what authorities describe as a calculated and targeted attack.

    Luigi Mangione, of Towson, Maryland, was detained Monday morning at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania. Law enforcement sources say he was apprehended after customers reported his suspicious behavior. When police arrived, they discovered a gun with a silencer, multiple fake IDs, and a manifesto criticizing the U.S. healthcare system.

    Mangione has not been charged but is considered a person of interest in the case. Authorities are investigating whether he traveled to Altoona by bus from Philadelphia after fleeing the crime scene in Manhattan.

    Thompson was killed last week by a masked assailant who approached him from behind at approximately 6:45 a.m. Surveillance footage captured the gunman fleeing on foot and then on a bicycle into Central Park. The suspect was last seen boarding a bus at a depot in Upper Manhattan, prompting a multi-state manhunt.

    The shooting sent shock waves across corporate and healthcare sectors. Thompson, a prominent figure in the industry, was known for his leadership in one of the nation’s largest private healthcare providers.

    Mangione’s manifesto reportedly condemns the healthcare industry for prioritizing profit over patient care. Law enforcement sources suggest that Mangione’s animosity may stem from personal experiences, as he lost close relatives in 2013 and 2017. During high school, Mangione worked briefly at an assisted-living facility, an experience that might have shaped his perspective.

    Authorities also found evidence of Mangione’s affinity for anti-capitalist causes and environmental activism. His online activity included approving quotes from Ted Kaczynski, the notorious “Unabomber,” as well as philosophical musings from figures like Socrates and Bruce Lee.

    The FBI is offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to an arrest, which is in addition to a $10,000 reward from Crime Stoppers and the NYPD. The incident has sparked debates on the safety of corporate executives and the broader implications of resentment toward the healthcare industry.

    Online reaction to Thompson’s murder has been mixed, with some expressing outrage and others highlighting grievances against private healthcare providers. Law enforcement officials are monitoring these discussions as part of their investigation.

    Mangione’s Background

    A valedictorian of the prestigious Gilman School in Baltimore, Mangione graduated in 2016 before pursuing artificial intelligence studies at the University of Pennsylvania. Once described as a promising student in computer and cognitive sciences, Mangione’s trajectory took a dark turn as he delved into radical ideologies.

    While authorities believe the shooter acted alone, they are piecing together the timeline of events leading to Thompson’s killing. Mangione’s motives and whether he has confessed remain unclear.

    This developing case underscores the intersection of personal grievances, ideological extremism, and violent action, leaving many in shock and mourning over the loss of a corporate leader. Investigators continue to urge anyone with information to come forward.

    #UnitedHealthcare #BrianThompson #LuigiMangione #HealthcareMurder #Altoona

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Jay-Z Denies Rape Allegation in Amended Lawsuit Naming Him and Sean "Diddy" Combs
    Dec 10 2024
    Jay-Z, the iconic rapper and entrepreneur, has strongly denied allegations in an amended lawsuit claiming that he, along with Sean "Diddy" Combs, drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl at a party in 2000. The lawsuit, filed under New York's Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, alleges the assault took place at a party following the MTV Video Music Awards in New York. The accuser, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges she was lured to the party under false pretenses. According to the lawsuit, Jane Doe was dropped off at Radio City Music Hall by a friend and later driven to a private party at a white house by a limousine driver employed by Mr. Combs. At the party, she alleges she was drugged and assaulted. Jay-Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, dismissed the allegations in a public statement, calling them a "blackmail attempt." He addressed the attorney representing the plaintiff, Tony Buzbee, saying: "My lawyer received a blackmail attempt, called a demand letter, from a 'lawyer' named Tony Buzbee. What he had calculated was the nature of these allegations and the public scrutiny would make me want to settle. No sir, it had the opposite effect! It made me want to expose you for the fraud you are in a VERY public fashion. So no, I will not give you ONE RED PENNY!!" Carter added, "The allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you (Tony Buzbee) file a criminal complaint, not a civil one!! Whomever would commit such a crime against a minor should be locked away, would you not agree?" Carter also expressed concern about the impact on his family, saying: "My only heartbreak is for my family. My wife and I will have to sit our children down, one of whom is at the age where her friends will surely see the press and ask questions about the nature of these claims, and explain the cruelty and greed of people." Mr. Combs, who faces unrelated sex-trafficking charges and is currently in jail awaiting trial, denied the allegations through his legal team. A statement from his representatives called the lawsuit "the latest in a series of shameless publicity stunts, designed to extract payments from celebrities who fear having lies spread about them, just as lies have been spread about Mr. Combs." The statement emphasized that Mr. Combs is confident in the judicial process and believes it will prove his innocence. Combs is currently facing 30 additional lawsuits, many alleging sexual assault or harassment. The lawsuit describes a chilling series of events in 2000. Jane Doe claims she was approached outside the VMAs by a limousine driver who said she "fit what Diddy was looking for." She alleges she was taken to a party where she observed widespread drug use and was served a drink that made her feel disoriented. According to the lawsuit, Jane Doe went into a room to lie down and was later joined by Mr. Combs, Mr. Carter, and an unnamed female celebrity. The lawsuit alleges that both men sexually assaulted her while the female celebrity watched. Jane Doe claims she fought back and eventually escaped when Mr. Combs paused in surprise. The lawsuit also states that Jane Doe continues to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and depression as a result of the alleged assault. She is seeking unspecified damages. Tony Buzbee, the Texas-based attorney representing Jane Doe, has faced criticism from both Carter and Combs. In response, he posted on social media, sharing a picture of himself in military uniform with a caption stating, "I also won't allow anyone to scare my clients into silence. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and I am quite certain the sun is coming." Buzbee has been involved in several high-profile cases in recent months, many involving allegations against celebrities. Critics have questioned his approach, but Buzbee remains adamant about seeking justice for his clients. As the case moves forward, it highlights the challenges survivors face when bringing allegations against powerful figures. The legal process will determine the validity of the claims, but for now, the public attention underscores the broader discussions about accountability and the treatment of survivors in high-profile cases. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins