Episode #631: “Community for me is an other-making category.” Judith Beyer, a legal and political anthropologist and the author of Rethinking Community in Myanmar, uses an ordinary word to expose a long political inheritance. Her fieldwork in Yangon began with Muslim and Hindu individuals who presented themselves to an outsider first and foremost as members of ethno-religious communities. But the closer she looked, and the more acquainted she became with these individuals, the less stable this self-categorization became.

In her book, Beyer traces the category back through British colonial rule, when law, land grants, religious property, and trusteeship helped organize migrants into corporate ethno-religious groups. Those arrangements survived independence and still shape property, personal-status law, and the way minorities are recognized by the state and present themselves to others. Yet the same temples and mosques that embody these classifications also contain relations that exceed them. For example, at the Mahapeinne Temple in Yangon, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, trustees, priests, workers, and worshippers can occupy the same space without becoming one coherent community. In the life of Mukhtaar Bhai,a Muslim of Shia identity, class, skin color, intermarriage, and his Sunni business relationships repeatedly cross the lines that supposedly define him.

The danger of fixed belonging becomes clearest in Beyer’s discussion of the Rohingya, whom she places at the far end of Myanmar’s long practice of making an excluded other. After the attempted military coup of 2021, the same problem follows people into exile. Beyer now prepares country-of-origin reports for British asylum cases, where courts may question whether someone is genuinely Rohingya or stateless. Rather than treating identity as an essence to be verified, she examines how states categorize people and what those classifications do to their lives.

She has not returned to Myanmar since the attempted coup because visiting her interlocutors could endanger them. The book grew from relationships she once expected to continue in person; now many of those relationships came to an end due to death or are separated by exile. While the categories she set out to question keep determining who can belong, who can be protected, and who can return.

Episode #630: “There's no fixing saṃsāra.” Khemarato Bhikkhu heard that line from a bhikkhuni in Berkeley after the 2016 U.S. election, at the moment when his faith in progress was already failing. An American monk now seven years ordained in Thailand’s Thai forest tradition, he had come to Buddhism through university stress, a Zen meditation group, friendships with Thai students, and a 2012 journey through Thailand. The Dhamma first made sense to him as something honest about craving, not-self, and the limits of worldly identity.

Before ordination, he had also entered one of the most future-facing worlds available: Silicon Valley. He joined Facebook early, then moved into education technology because he wanted his work to help society. But education’s deepest problems began to look political rather than technical, and Trump’s rise broke something in the narrative that history naturally moves forward. A month-long retreat in 2018 clarified what the Berkeley discourse had exposed: he had been trying to repair saṃsāra itself.

Ordination did not erase grief. It required leaving a romantic relationship, disappointing parents proud of his career, and accepting that the ordinary future of marriage, children, status, and income was no longer his path. In Thailand, however, renunciation became concrete rather than abstract: an alms bowl, food freely offered by lay supporters, a forest monastery where community provides enough support for solitude, and a practice life organized around Buddho, vipassana, the Pāṭimokkha, and the rains retreat.

The hardest teachings remain bodily. Autopsy practice at a Bangkok hospital turns death from doctrine into direct perception; each corpse trains the mind to see that every living person is already dying. Khemarato Bhikkhu does not present the monastery as a way to fix the world. It is the place where he tests whether the Buddha was right that saṃsāra is not the only possibility, and whether a human life can be organized around that fact before the body ends.

Episode #629: “They don’t sleep with their leg on.” Jason Bender, a certified prosthetist who lived and worked in Myanmar from 2014 to 2021 before supporting cross-border work from Thailand, uses that basic reality to explain why providing a prosthetic limb cannot be reduced to handing someone a device. A leg may restore mobility after a landmine injury, but the socket changes as the body changes, feet wear out, sores develop, and users must learn to walk again across environments that were difficult to navigate even before amputation.

In Myanmar, that process can require months of healing followed by a journey to one of relatively few clinics, where a patient may remain for days or weeks while a socket is made and walking begins. Rural hills, dirt paths, stilt houses, and inaccessible urban sidewalks often make wheelchairs impractical, while years on crutches can damage the shoulders and leave both hands occupied. Near conflict-affected border regions, Bender recalls landmines and other war injuries accounting for most of the amputations he encountered.

The work demanded adaptation. Forestry workers asked Bender’s team to remove the toes from prosthetic feet because the shortened shape made steep mountain climbing easier. When imported aluminum pylons became unavailable at one remote clinic, local practitioners found a strong, lightweight tree and carved wooden replacements. New technologies may offer further options: digitally scanned and 3D-printed sockets could allow more stages of care to happen closer to patients.

The 2021 coup intensified the contradiction. War-related trauma increased while clinics moved, supply routes deteriorated, and patients with conspicuous injuries risked questioning at military checkpoints. Bender sees local training, digital tools, and improvisation as ways to preserve access, but none eliminates the need for continuing care. A prosthesis may restore a person’s ability to move through the world; keeping that possibility alive depends on people and services remaining close enough to repair it when the body, the device, or the country changes.

Episode #628: “We started with emotions, not with the basic fundamental facts.” Nay Chi Min Htun was a university student and hotel receptionist in Yangon before the 2021 coup. Within months, she had left the home of her police-officer father, joined an underground resistance network, and begun transporting explosives. She later moved into Karen State, where she produced ammunition, trained as a drone operator, and participated in frontline operations against military positions.

The physical details stayed with her. Ammunition production repeatedly burned her fingertips, marks she wore with pride because other resistance workers had lost limbs or died in accidents. Her first bomb-carrying fixed-wing drone nose-dived back toward her own team and landed within feet of them without exploding. During another battle, her team lost contact with a loaded drone flying across villages and resistance positions until a commander improvised a repair using a motorcycle battery.

Over time, technical competence brought greater responsibility. Nay Chi trained new recruits and became head of a resistance column’s news and information department, where she raised funds and had to take on her most challenging duty yet, which was to publicly announce comrades’ deaths and oversee their funerals. By April 2026, after family trauma, the end of a long relationship, declining physical health, and growing doubts about whether she possessed the knowledge required to lead others, she left.

Her moral certainty has also become more complicated. Meeting a detained suspected soldier, his wife, and their infant forced her to confront the humanity she had tried not to see while fighting. She still believes the resistance is justified and may return to the armed resistance, but she no longer thinks courage alone is enough. The unresolved question is now what she must learn so that other people can safely depend on her decisions as a leader.

Episode #627: Joseph Goldstein’s introduction to meditation came almost accidentally. Sent to Thailand with the Peace Corps in the 1960s, he discovered Buddhist practice through monks at a Bangkok temple before traveling to Bodh Gayā, where he trained under Munindraji in the Burmese Mahāsī tradition. What followed was a lifetime spent exploring how teachings rooted in Asian Buddhist cultures could be carried into Western society without losing their essential purpose.

His years in India brought him into contact with S. N. Goenka, Dipa Ma, and other influential practitioners whose approaches differed considerably. After returning to America in 1974, Goldstein helped establish the Western Vipassanā movement alongside Jack Kornfield and Sharon Salzberg, eventually co-founding the Insight Meditation Society. Yet the growing movement also confronted differences over methodology, lineage, and whether practitioners should remain within one tradition or learn from several.

Goldstein's understanding of transmission evolved beyond questions of meditation technique. Initially confident that universal Buddhist teachings required little adaptation, he gradually recognized how social exclusion, racism, and trauma could prevent people from accessing or integrating those teachings. His involvement in expanding diversity at IMS challenged assumptions he had carried for decades. “The teachings are universal, but for people to hear them and learn from them, they have to come.”

His reflections also return to Myanmar, where he practiced intensively under Sayadaw U Paṇḍita and witnessed the extraordinary generosity of communities supporting monastic life, often despite having very little themselves. As warfare and military repression have devastated the country, Goldstein acknowledges the responsibility felt by those who have benefited from its Buddhist traditions to support the people who preserved and transmitted these teachings. Rather than prescribing a single form of engagement, he emphasizes that practitioners can respond in different ways according to their circumstances, while sharing a common sense of gratitude, compassion, and responsibility toward the country and its people.

Episode #626: This is the first episode of a seven-part series reflecting voices of people who attended the Fifth International Conference on Burma/Myanmar Studies in Chiang Mai, which explored how people are responding to the crisis while working toward a different future. Through shorter conversations with scholars, activists, educators, and community organizers, we connect regional politics with the everyday work of sustaining care, learning, livelihoods, and solidarity.

The first guest, Fuadi Pitsuwan, a Thammasat University lecturer and former foreign policy adviser to Thailand’s Move Forward Party, questions why Thailand invests so heavily in Myanmar’s military as a source of stability when its actions keep the country fragmented.

Thailand once supported ethnic armed groups as a buffer, then pursued trade and investment in the hope of political opening. Gas dependence, business interests and competition with China now constrain its choices, but Fuadi disputes whether those pressures justify the legitimacy granted to the junta.

Alongside official diplomacy, Thailand allows space for ethnic leaders and civil society. He wants civilian agencies to develop those relationships deliberately, supporting education, administration and health services that benefit both countries. Yet even proposals to let displaced Myanmar medical workers treat their compatriots have stalled despite broad agreement. His difficulty lies in converting acceptance into action: “I don’t know which lever to pull.”

“We have to do something more,” says our second guest, Agnes, a counseling who developed the suicide-prevention app Shin Tan after years of training and support failed to stop reports of deaths from reaching her. After Myanmar’s 2021 military coup, displacement, lost work, and interrupted education placed further strain on families already affected by COVID. Agnes also identifies beliefs that make suicide seem predetermined, complicating efforts to recognize distress and seek help.

A workshop in 2022 drew more than 200 participants, but many could not take the training back to their communities. Alongside supervised group and individual support, Shin Tan offers mental-health information, self-care tools, and questions directing users toward guidance. It works offline after downloading, addressing the unreliable connections that can keep help distant. However, the people she hopes to reach may have neither reliable internet nor someone they feel able to call.

Episode #625: “When nobody helps you, what you have to do is go. You know what? I’m just gonna do it myself.” Adrian Zaw, a Burmese-American actor, producer, and founder of Zaw Studios, has turned that refusal to wait into both a business method and a response to cultural absence. His family left Myanmar after the 1988 uprising, when his father’s political involvement made remaining unsafe. His parents had worked as rural doctors, but in the United States their credentials disappeared; they took cafeteria and laboratory jobs while Zaw learned English by imitating television.

Acting gave him a route through adolescence, but Hollywood offered almost no Burmese-American models or roles. He learned producing, photography, editing, and studio management so that he could create work rather than depend on someone else to recognize him. In 2012, he opened a small production space whose rent forced him to work quickly. Speed became a philosophy: deliver what a client needs, revise it immediately, and refuse to hide delay behind artistic perfectionism.

Zaw now passes that discipline to young Burmese-American interns, matching practical training to whatever skills they bring. He tells them to replace “I can’t” with “How can I?” and identify the personal advantage that might open the next door. Yet his method also carries a distance: the access he can provide in Orange County does not automatically reach people inside Myanmar, and after the 2021 coup he has been unable to return.

His larger answer is cultural production. Through Myanmar American TV, he wants Burmese performers to tell sitcoms, dramas, and thrillers shaped by their own humor and family experience. Mainstream roles have often reduced Burmese characters to antagonists; his sketches use fortune telling, in-laws, and generational pressure to make Burmese-American life visible from within. The proof of concept exists, and the studio continues training people through it, but the platform still needs money, collaborators, and an audience willing to act with the urgency he demands. “Opportunity is knocking, and nobody’s answering the door because they’re not being responsive quick enough.”

Episode #624: “Even before the coup, books gave me ideas, empathy, and hope,” says Zu May Lwin, a student activist and library organizer from Magway, She argues that education and access to books are essential not only for personal growth but also for rebuilding Myanmar after military repression.

Before the 2021 coup, she explains, reading culture in Magway was limited by cost, scarcity, and exhaustion. Books were hard to obtain, many families were focused on survival, and schools did little to cultivate a meaningful relationship with literature beyond textbooks. She joined a mobile library initiative that brought books directly to parks and university campuses. It was very successful, showing her that interest in reading could grow when books became part of public life.

The coup transformed that work into something more urgent. Believing students had a duty to defend freedom and the right to learn, she joined peaceful demonstrations in Magway as part of the Civil Disobedience Movement. At one protest, she was arrested, and spent over eight harsh months in prison. After her release, she could not safely return home and instead moved through displacement areas near the Thai border. There she saw young people continuing to study despite losing schools, textbooks, and stability, which deepened her conviction that education was a form of resistance.

In response, she helped found Saffron Traveler, a project that builds small, mobile libraries in rural and conflict-affected areas. Supported by donations and local cooperation, these libraries serve displaced students while remaining movable enough to survive military pressure. As she puts it, “My dream is to create a strong library culture in Myanmar, where every young person—no matter where they live or what their background—can have access to books and learning spaces and the opportunity to grow.”