• EP. 159 – Jury nullification in the US (Glenn Reynolds, University of Tennessee College of Law)

  • Sep 16 2024
  • Length: 42 mins
  • Podcast

EP. 159 – Jury nullification in the US (Glenn Reynolds, University of Tennessee College of Law)

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • Imagine you are a juror in a criminal trial. The evidence is overwhelming that the defendant is guilty. But you can’t shake the feeling that it would be unjust to convict. Maybe you don’t believe what the defendant did should be treated as a crime. Or maybe you simply believe the defendant deserves mercy. Can you vote to acquit, or must you vote according to the evidence?

    It turns out that, in the US and the UK, jurors do have the power to acquit, even if they believe a defendant committed the charged crime. This is known as jury nullification.

    In this episode, host Janelle Wrigley chats with Professor Glenn Reynolds from the University of Tennessee College of Law. They discuss the history of jury nullification in the US, the role of the jury, and the debate on whether jurors should be told they have the power to nullify if they believe a conviction would be unjust.
    Show More Show Less
Show More Show Less

What listeners say about EP. 159 – Jury nullification in the US (Glenn Reynolds, University of Tennessee College of Law)

Average Customer Ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com.au reviews

Amazon Reviews
No Reviews are Available
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.