Text here:

NOTES: 

[1] Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum VI, no. 26003.

[2] Cf. Dogmatic Poems, V, 53-64: PG 37, 428-429.

[3] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1817-1821.

[4] Summa Theologiae, II-IIae, q.4, a.1.

[5] H. Köster in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament VIII (1972), p.586.

[6] De excessu fratris sui Satyri, II, 47: CSEL 73, 274.

[7] Ibid., II, 46: CSEL 73, 273.

[8] Cf. Ep. 130 Ad Probam 14, 25-15, 28: CSEL 44, 68-73.

[9] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1025.

[10] Jean Giono, Les vraies richesses, Paris 1936, Preface, quoted in Henri de Lubac, Catholicisme. Aspects sociaux du dogme, Paris 1983, p. VII.

[11] Ep. 130 Ad Probam 13, 24: CSEL 44, 67.

[12] Sententiae III, 118: CCL 6/2, 215.

[13] Cf. ibid. III, 71: CCL 6/2, 107-108.

[14] Novum Organum I, 117.

[15] Cf. ibid. I, 129.

[16] Cf. New Atlantis.

[17] In Werke IV, ed. W. Weischedel (1956), p.777. The essay on “The Victory of the Good over the Evil Principle” constitutes the third chapter of the text Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (“Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone”), which Kant published in 1793.

[18] I. Kant, Das Ende aller Dinge, in Werke VI, ed. W. Weischedel (1964), p.190.

[19] Chapters on charity, Centuria 1, ch. 1: PG 90, 965.

[20] Cf. ibid.: PG 90, 962-966.

[21] Conf. X 43, 70: CSEL 33, 279.

[22] Sermo 340, 3: PL 38, 1484; cf. F. Van der Meer, Augustine the Bishop, London and New York 1961, p.268.

[23] Sermo 339, 4: PL 38, 1481.

[24] Conf. X 43, 69: CSEL 33, 279.

[25] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2657.

[26] Cf. In 1 Ioannis 4, 6: PL 35, 2008f.

[27] Testimony of Hope, Boston 2000, pp.121ff.

[28] The Liturgy of the Hours, Office of Readings, 24 November.

[29] Sermones in Cant., Sermo 26, 5: PL 183, 906.

[30] Negative Dialektik (1966), Third part, III, 11, in Gesammelte Schriften VI, Frankfurt am Main 1973, p.395.

[31] Ibid., Second part, p.207.

[32] DS 806.

[33] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 988-1004.

[34] Cf. ibid., 1040.

[35] Cf. Tractatus super Psalmos, Ps 127, 1-3: CSEL 22, 628-630.

[36] Gorgias 525a-526c.

[37] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1033-1037.

[38] Cf. ibid., 1023-1029.

[39] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1030-1032.

[40] Cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1032.

I definitely will not fault people for putting forth this Petros/Petra argument because it is a very common argument that people make but there are a number of problems with it, and if I were to summarize those problems they would go like this:

1) First, the very layout of Matthew 16 is a three-fold blessing, and each part of that blessing is itself in three parts, a blessing, and explanation of the blessing, and a further explanation of the blessing. It's a threefold blessing of Peter and it goes like this: 

1) Blessed are you Simon son of Jonah, 

1a) for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you

1b) but my father was in heaven.

2) I tell you, you are rock

2a) and Upon This Rock I will build my church

2b) and the Gates of Hell will not Prevail against it

3) I give you the keys to the kingdom

3a) that whatever you bind on Earth is bound in heaven

3b) that whatever you loose on Earth is loosed in heaven.

That alone tells you all you need to know given the structure of this sentence and where it is situated within a three-fold blessing.

2) Of course we can go deeper than this because we know that Jesus spoke Aramaic and the word in Aramaic that he used for Peter's name is Kepha, transliterated as Cephas in Greek (well, ripped from Aramaic into Greek and then Greek into English, but you get the gist!)

The Aramaic word for a small stone is EVNA, not KEPHA. Had Jesus intended for Peter to be known as the little Stone, we would be speaking of Simon Evan, not Simon Peter.

3) as you yourself pointed out Petra is feminine, Petros is masculine. It is fine to use feminine words when speaking of men if there is no other way for that word to me made masculine, but using a word metaphorically And giving somebody a brand new name are two entirely different things. Calling him "petra" would be calling him "Mrs. Rock," so Jesus is just changing the gender of the word to match Peter's gender.

4) Multiple, MULTIPLE Protestant scholars Disagree fundamentally with what you've said and agree with what I've written, namely: 

-There is no distinction in meaning between "petros" and "petra."

-Two different Greek words are used because you can't use a feminine noun for a man's name.

-"This rock" refers to Peter.

-The identity of the rock ("petra") is affirmed by the Aramaic that Jesus was speaking.

...So this isn't just a Catholic position. https://phatcatholic.blogspot.com/2006/09/protestant-scholars-on-mt-1616-19.html?m=1&fbclid=IwAR3vP4x1_VMC74-QrwDKxRD59ir0_PxvxYk1yVeBCGxEsshI_zvHo-vD3oU 

5) NONE of this necessarily actually denies that Jesus is also the rock, OR that the statment of faith is ALSO also the rock. In fact, the Catechism in paragraph 424 states exactly this: "Moved by the grace of the Holy Spirit and drawn by the Father, we believe in Jesus and confess: ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’3 On the rock of this faith confessed by St. Peter, Christ built his Church."

BUT that doesn't preclude the other, more OBVIOUS meaning state above from being true (and the church of coures also understands that the be the principle interpretation, CF: http://www.catholic-catechism.com/ccc_153.424.440.442.552.553.586.849.881.1444.htm )

Hopefully that's helpful!

Authentic Christianity is a channel dedicated to presenting the truth of the Authentic Gospel.

Got a question? Email askcatholics@gmail.com

DONATE to support this channel:

http://bit.ly/DonateToAskCatholics

NOTE: This is the audio from the youtube Read through here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZktxO6adTnI If you find this helpful, go like their youtube channel.

Their Description: 

=========
just a cheeky chuggalug.

full reading of https://easypeasymethod.org, enabling you to painlessl y quit porn immediately, without willpower or any sense of deprivation or sacrifice. a link to the mp3 is located on the website.

was pretty zonked after verbalising this thing. know that reading a whole *one hundred pages* is pretty much the same as getting your throat cut, so here you go. (please start reading books again)

big thanks to "hello Michael" for doing all the audio stuff to make it sound nice.

michael's alternative title: thirsty guy sucks on waterbottle while reading about porn (NSFW)

just quickly, the website used to be https://pmohackbook.org but changed the domain a while back.

my website is https://snug.gy fyi :o)

=========

Rough Chapter Breakdown:

00:08:35 - Chapter 1: Introduction

00:22:30 - Chapter 2: The Easy Method

00:27:49 - Chapter 3: Why is it difficult to stop?

00:34:30 - 3.1: The Sinister Trap

00:40:10 - Chapter 4: Nature

00:44:35 - 4.1: The Little Monster

00:46:26 - 4.2: The Annoying Alarm

00:49:58 - 4.3: A pleasure or a crutch?

00:53:02 - 4.4: Crossing the red line

00:56:34 - 4.5: The High from the Dance Around the Red Line

00:59:26 - 4.6: The Smokers Analogy

01:02:20 - Chapter 5: Brainwashing

01:04:20 - 5.1: Scientific reasoning

01:06:10 - 5.2: Problems using willpower

01:08:49 - 5.3: Passivity

01:11:21 - 5.4: Withdrawal Pangs

01:13:26 - Chapter 6: Brainwashing Aspects

01:14:36 - 6.1: Stress

01:17:53 - 6.2: Boredom

01:20:00 - 6.3: Concentration

01:22:36 - 6.4: Relaxation

01:26:11 - 6.5: Energy

01:29:28 - 6.6: Social Night Sessions

01:33:13 - Chapter 7: What am I giving up?

01:34:38 - 7.1: There’s nothing to give up

01:36:54 - 7.2: Void, the void, the beautiful void!

01:40:21 - Chapter 8: Saving Time

01:47:35 - Chapter 9: Health

02:02:09 - 9.1: Sinister Black Shadows

02:03:28 - Chapter 11: The Willpower Method

02:22:42 - Chapter 12: Beware of Cutting Down

02:32:02 - Chapter 13: Just One Peek

02:36:22 - Chapter 14: Casual Users

02:58:03 - Chapter 15: The YouTube / Twitch / Instagram User

03:04:12 - Chapter 16: A social habit?

03:08:39 - Chapter 17: Timing

03:23:00 - Chapter 18: Will I miss the fun?

03:27:21 - Chapter 19: Can I Compartmentalize?

03:32:28- Chapter 20: Avoid False Incentives

03:40:05 - Chapter 21: The Easy Way to Stop

03:52:15 - Chapter 22: The Withdrawal Period

04:03:52 - Chapter 23: Just One Little Peek

04:06:00 - Chapter 24: Will it be harder for me?

04:09:21 - 24.1: Primary Reasons for Failure

04:11:57 - Chapter 25: Substitutes

04:18:59 - Chapter 26: Should I Avoid Temptation Situations

04:24:16 - Chapter 27: The Moment of Revelation

04:29:50 - Chapter 28: The Final Visit

04:38:09 - 28.1: A Final Warning

04:39:38 - Chapter 29: Feedback

04:50:53 - 29.1: The Checklist

04:53:54 - Chapter 30: Help Those on the Sinking Ship

05:01:23 - Chapter 31: Advice to Non-users

05:01:28 - 31.1: Help get your porn using friends to read this book

05:03:39 - 31.2: Should I tell my significant other?

05:04:58 - 31.3: My partner is quitting porn

05:08:37 - 31.4: Slipping (relapse)

05:18:01 - 31.5: What about MO (masturbation, orgasm)?

05:20:16 - 31.6: Deviations from standard advice

05:21:04 - 31.7: Help end this scandal

05:27:12 - 31.8: Final Warning

05:28:09 - Chapter 32: The Instructions

05:29:03 - 32.1: Affirmations 

In this episode we are going to look at a piece of shotgun apologetics shared on the most popular social media platform out there and dissect what's wrong with it but also give as charitable of a response to it as we can.

Video podcast here: https://youtu.be/4p9Qv_ieKFE

Video on Prayer to the Saints in Scripture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk6GmlsUFQ4

Jesus teaches Purgatory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8jDvCTDpIQ 

You believe in purgatory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGtBDgaT0aE


The questions were posed as such:
______________________________________________________
If the Bible is a "catholic book" then why did they omit
the following:
-saying mass ....
-consecrating bread ....
-turning wine into blood ....
-Eucharist ....
-baptizing babies ...
-hearing confessions ...
-confirming anyone .....
-Last Rites ....
-asking Mary to intercede ....
-Mary as "New Eve"
-Mary as the Ark
-praying to"saints"....
-papacy ...
-purgatory ...
-novenas ....
-monks ...
-nuns ...
-etc.
-etc.
______________________________________________________
Obviously that's a lot of each one of these we could talk about at length for probably hours. But in this video I'm going to try to answer well enough each one of these point-by-point oh, and even conceive that one of them is true though the rest are false.

Authentic Christianity is a channel dedicated to presenting the truth of the Christian faith as it has been handed down from the apostles.

Got a question? Email askcatholics@gmail.com
DONATE to support this channel:
http://bit.ly/DonateToAskCatholics  

Here is a short syllogism that has to premises that SEEM true, but which lead to a conclusion that utterly undermines the very scriptures they seek to bolster.

Premise 1) SCRIPTURE IS THE SOLE/ONLY INFALLBILE SOURCE OF AUTHORITY
Premise 2) THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE IS NOT IN SCRIPTURE.
CONCLUSION: THEREFORE, THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE IS FALLIBLE

One of those

Jesus himself taught Purgatory exists.

And he's pretty clear that those there can be saved, but there is a level of punishment or suffering there.

In Luke 12, he gives a series of eschatological parables.

The first one ends thus:

"You also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.”

This makes it clear that his parable was about the end.

But then Luke continues:

41 Peter asked, “Lord, are you telling this parable to us, or to everyone?”

42 The Lord answered, “Who then is the faithful and wise steward, whom the master puts in charge of his servants to give them their food allowance at the proper time? 43 It will be good for that servant whom the master finds doing so when he returns. 44 Truly I tell you, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. 45 But suppose the servant says to himself, ‘My master is taking a long time in coming,’ and he then begins to beat the other servants, both men and women, and to eat and drink and get drunk. 46 The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the unbelievers.

47 “The servant who knows the master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what the master wants will be beaten with many blows. 48 But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.

This is an eschatological (pointed towards the end) parable...

A - One steward is rewarded for being faithful and wise.(Heaven)

B - A second steward is a drunk, and he's "cut in half" (literally: d???t?µ?se?- that's the word we get "dichotomy" from) and sent to be with the unbelievers (Hell)

Then we have two more.

C The third steward knows the master's will and doesn't get ready, he intentionally disobeys, so he's beaten with MANY blows (but not kicked out like B).

D The fourth steward doesn't know things, and thus is not as culpable for his mistakes. He is beaten with FEW blows (but again, is not thrust out like B was)

Escatalogically, this is purgatory. The one who knew more and failed IS beaten or punished, but ultimately attains heaven. The one who knew less is judged with more mercy. Still something akin to punishment happens (because being purified is a process) but salvation is the end for C and D, as it is of A. It is only B who is utterly destroyed.

And what's the next part of this gospel? In case you needed confirmation, Jesus gives ANOTHER parable about some place of punishment after this life that is not hell.

Luke 12:58?-59 – Jesus teaches us, “Come to terms with your opponent or you will be handed over to the judge and thrown into prison. You will not get out until you have paid the last penny.” The word “opponent” (antidiko) is likely a reference to the devil (see the same word for devil in 1 Pet. 5:8) who is an accuser against man (c.f. Job 1.6-12; Zech. 3.1; Rev. 12.10), and God is the judge. If we have not adequately dealt with satan and sin in this life, we will be held in a temporary state called a prison, and we won’t get out until we have satisfied our entire debt to God. This “prison” is purgatory where we will not get out until the last penny is paid.

The Ballad of the White Horse. By G K Chesterton BOOK V. ETHANDUNE: THE FIRST STROKE

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1719/1719-h/1719-h.htm

The Ballad of the White Horse BOOK IV. THE WOMAN IN THE FOREST | G. K. Chesterton

Source: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1719/1719-h/1719-h.htm