Who Says You're Dead?
Medical & Ethical Dilemmas for the Curious & Concerned
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $24.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Jonathan Yen
About this listen
Drawing upon the author's two decades teaching medical ethics, as well as his work as a practicing psychiatrist, this profound and addictive little book offers up challenging ethical dilemmas and asks listeners, What would you do?
- A daughter gets tested to see if she's a match to donate a kidney to her father. The test reveals that she is not the man's biological daughter. Should the doctor tell the father? Or the daughter?
- A deaf couple prefers a deaf baby. Should they be allowed to use medical technology to ensure they have a child who can't hear?
- Who should get custody of an embryo created through IVF when a couple divorces?
- Or, when you or a loved one is on life support, Who says you're dead?
In short, engaging scenarios, Dr. Appel takes on hot-button issues that many of us will confront: genetic screening, sexuality, privacy, doctor-patient confidentiality. He unpacks each hypothetical with a brief reflection drawing from science, philosophy, and history, explaining how others have approached these controversies in real-world cases. Who Says You're Dead? is designed to defy easy answers and to stimulate thought and even debate among professionals and armchair ethicists alike.
©2019 Jacob M. Appel (P)2019 HighBridge, a division of Recorded BooksWhat listeners say about Who Says You're Dead?
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Timothy Mcardle
- 26-12-2022
Bullet points, lacks depth or analysis
With each topic being around 5 mins long, there is no depth or analysis. Was hoping to be presented with ethical and moral viewpoints perhaps which I had not considered myself. Instead, it's basically a list of facts, e.g X number of people have this, Y percentage of hospitals do that. Factual infotainment is different to moral & ethical considerations. I'm certain the author is more than capable of presenting the latter. Not here, however.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!