The Shadow of the Black Hole
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $21.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Rick Adamson
-
By:
-
John W. Moffat
About this listen
Black holes entered the world of science fiction and films in the 1960s, and their popularity in our culture remains today. The buzz surrounding black holes was and is due, in large part, to their speculative nature. It is still difficult for the general public to determine fact versus fiction as it pertains to this terrifying idea: something big enough to swallow anything and everything in close proximity, with a gravitational force so strong that nothing, including light, can escape.
In the fall of 2015, scientists at the Laser Interferometry Gravitational-Wave Observatory detected the first sounds from black holes, brought to earth by the gravitational waves that emitted from the merging of two black holes 1.4 billion light years away in space. In the spring of 2017, physicists and astronomers who were working on the Event Horizon Telescope project captured the first image of a black hole. This was the supermassive black hole hosted by the galaxy M87 in the constellation Virgo, 53 million light years away, and the image shows the shadow the black hole casts upon the bright light surrounding it.
In this book, John Moffat shares the history of black holes and presents the latest research into these mysterious celestial objects, including the astounding results from gravitational wave detection and the shadow of the black hole.
©2020 John Moffat (P)2020 TantorWhat listeners say about The Shadow of the Black Hole
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Matthew willey
- 18-09-2021
A Pet Theory
It starts off well, with some nice narratives and personal experience of gravitational experiments. However it soon veers into the promotion of a modified theory of gravity which the author is keen to promote. He is disparaging of the idea of dark matter and dark energy and compares them unfavourably to epicycles. Much of his arguments to promote his theory are highly technical and would be better posted in scientific papers, where his peers and not the lay reader would have the tools to judge them.
It’s not an unbiased account of the science, and that’s what I was looking for.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!