The Modern Scholar: Classic Foundations
Purpose and Tradition in Architecture
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $21.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Professor Carroll William Westfall
About this listen
In this engaging series of lectures, Carroll William Westfall, the University of Notre Dame's Frank Montana Professor of Architecture, delves into the classical principles of Western architecture. Exploring features such as ornamentation, decoration, and innovation, Professor Westfall shows how architecture is derived from the very principles that form the cornerstones of our civilization - and, with scholarly precision, he also demonstrates how this field of endeavor is rooted in nature itself.
©2012 Carroll William Westfall (P)2012 Crescite Group, LLCWhat listeners say about The Modern Scholar: Classic Foundations
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Michelle
- 03-08-2017
Enjoyable
Learnt a great deal and enjoyed it from start to finish.
I'm planning to listen again because there was a lot to take in.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- James C Steadman
- 09-08-2022
It’s okay—less of a history, more of a one-sided debate
It’s an interesting series of lectures, but within the context of other architectural theories, especially with concerns regarding the traditionally western-centric views of architectural history, it’s a bit surface level.
I was surprised with the actual lack of history regarding the topic, considering that’s how this series bills itself. It’s mostly cursory and doesn’t really attempt to discus the architects or the buildings which helped shape how traditional architecture was formed and why their innovations were important. A lot of these speeches focus on America for some reason, whereas I’d expect that proportionally, the vast majority would’ve been spent on Europe.
Equally surprising was the bias inherent within his speeches for traditional architecture, but without the same critical analysis done on the subject that’s given to other theories such as modernism. While I’m not a big advocate for modernism, it came about from some exceptionally valid concerns. He seems to cherry pick the ‘best’ of traditional and the ‘worst’ of other theories/styles and often without giving proper contextual thought as to why these styles evolved or why they were chosen over traditional styles beyond what I’d expect from an undergraduate’s level of theoretical understanding, which was disappointing.
Having said this, it was an interesting series of lectures, with many valid concerns, especially around the rise of globalism and the seemingly poor education regarding traditional western architecture.
I liked the time spent discussing the cultural institutions which helped form traditional architecture and the importance of civic architecture to create cities and buildings that helped people be their best, in theory. However, many of his points are somewhat nonsense in reality if you’ve ever had to do this stuff or if you’ve studied any town planning or done economic analysis for urban areas. But this doesn’t make it invalid, and I largely agree with what he says here.
The distinction between a civic-focused architect and ‘modern’ architect was interesting but I felt could’ve been more fleshed-out; there’s something there but, as said above, he neglects to consider other cultural contexts and even those from related professions such as urban planners, which might’ve made this more impactful.
Overall, it was okay, and probably good if you’ve never read any architectural theory but want to better understand the importance of some of the key characteristics of traditional buildings and their (historical) symbolism.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!