Try free for 30 days
-
Slanted
- How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism
- Narrated by: Sharyl Attkisson
- Length: 9 hrs and 49 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $26.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Publisher's Summary
New York Times best-selling author Sharyl Attkisson takes on the media’s misreporting on Black Lives Matter, coronavirus, Joe Biden, Silicon Valley censorship, and more.
When the facts don’t fit their narrative, the media abandons the facts, not the narrative. Virtually every piece of information you get through the media has been massaged, shaped, curated, and manipulated before it reaches you. Some of it is censored entirely. The news can no longer be counted on to reflect all the facts. Instead of telling us what happened yesterday, they tell us what’s new in the prepackaged soap opera they’ve been calling the news.
For the past four years, five-time Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist and New York Times best-selling author Sharyl Attkisson has been collecting and dissecting alarming incidents tracing the shocking devolution of what used to be the most respected news organizations on the planet. For the first time, top news executives and reporters representing every major national television news outlet - from ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN to FOX and MSNBC - speak frankly, confiding in Attkisson about the death of the news as they once knew it. Their concern transcends partisan divides.
Most frightening of all, a broad campaign in the media has convinced many Americans not only to accept but to demand censorship over journalism. It is a stroke of genius on the part of those seeking to influence public opinion: undermine public confidence in the news, then insist upon “curating” information and divining the “truth”. The thinking is done for you. They’ll decide which pesky facts shouldn’t cross your desk by declaring them false, irrelevant, debunked, unsafe, or out-of-bounds.
We have reached a state of utter absurdity, where journalism schools teach students that their own personal truth or chosen narratives matter more than reality. In Slanted, Attkisson digs into the language of propagandists, the persistence of false media narratives, the driving forces behind today's dangerous blend of facts and opinion, the abandonment of journalism ethics, and the new, Orwellian definition of what it means to report the news.
Supplemental enhancement PDF accompanies the audiobook.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
What listeners say about Slanted
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Surprised
- 28-05-2021
A symptom of post-modernist neo-marxism
This book catalogues numerous examples of where leftist groupthink narratives run counter to the truth. Far fewer examples are provided from the other side.
I suspect that this is, in large part, due to the cultural influence of post-modernist neo-marxism i.e. the driving force behind critical social justice theory and its movements such as BLM. This leftist ideology openly and unashamedly admits to prioritising political utility over the truth and is unconcerned by its own inconsistencies, contradictions and hypocrisy.
Note: For those new to this topic, please be aware that, as with all critical social justice theory concepts, the term 'critical social justice theory' is, itself, a triumph of cynical and manipulative wordplay over reality. It is not about critical thinking nor about justice, not as those terms are commonly understood by those not steeped in this intellectually corrosive ideology.
Critical social justice theory has buttressed itself in academia from where it has been churning out miseducated graduates who have then moved into all the social institutions including, of course, the media. The author correctly identifies that many of today's journalists see their role not as reporters of the news but as guardians of the narrative. They are more interested in activism than journalism. This is hardly surprising when you consider that journalism students are taught by similarly skewed academics who are more interested in activism than scholarship.
In this light, the balance of examples in this book is quite plausibly a reflection of the underlying reality during the Trump era rather than the product of the author's own bias, as some of the few one- and two-star reviewers have asserted.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!