Try free for 30 days
-
Reality+
- Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy
- Narrated by: Grant Cartwright
- Length: 17 hrs and 12 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $33.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Publisher's Summary
Brought to you by Penguin.
In the coming decades, the technology that enables virtual and augmented reality will improve beyond recognition. Within a century, world-renowned philosopher David J. Chalmers predicts, we will have virtual worlds that are impossible to distinguish from non-virtual worlds. But is virtual reality just escapism? In a highly original work of 'technophilosophy', Chalmers argues categorically, no: virtual reality is genuine reality. Virtual worlds are not second-class worlds. We can live a meaningful life in virtual reality - and increasingly, we will.
What is reality, anyway? How can we lead a good life? Is there a god? How do we know there's an external world - and how do we know we're not living in a computer simulation? In Reality+, Chalmers conducts a grand tour of philosophy, using cutting-edge technology to provide invigorating new answers to age-old questions.
Drawing on examples from pop culture, literature and film that help bring philosophical issues to life, Reality+ is a mind-bending journey through virtual worlds, illuminating the nature of reality and our place within it.
What listeners say about Reality+
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- billy
- 07-03-2022
convinced
this book has convinced me that mental illness is a prerequisite for being a professional philosopher
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Peter
- 24-02-2022
Taking the simulation argument to the next level
The self-confessed atheist and world leading expert on the study of consciousness, David Chalmers writes that Simulation theory provides one of the best arguments for the existence of God. For anyone who wants to win the debate either way, this book is essential reading. David is bound by the chains of the methodology of his discipline and holds the questions of the meaning of virtual worlds against the light of major philosophies throughout history. Spoiler alert. How did I know you would keep reading? That chair that you have grown up knowing as being real is still real whether it is made of atoms or digital information. You have been thrown out of Eden where a rock is a rock and an apple is red and now know reality is not that simple but under most scenarios you know what rocks and apples are and that’s all that matters. The study of philosophy is useless, except that it has given us the most important things in humanity such as art, religion, economic and political systems and even science. Will Reality + provide a roadmap to Humanity 3.0 as we try to breaker a truce with AI? Oh, and yes, if you believe you are in a simulation, you might get an afterlife.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- W. C. Nesmith
- 19-05-2024
Really Out There
I almost got halfway through before I had to stop. It doesn't reflect reality as I know it. And it wouldn't be ethical to create a simulated environment with suffering. I don't think we would ever create simulations that replicate our world with conscious entities. It wouldn't be ethical. But here is an entire book about it. More interested in the types of beings that we do end up creating. They won't have our shortcomings like the ability to experience pain. I did not enjoy this book but it seems to be well researched information. Proceed at your own risk.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Joseph Bertolini
- 03-05-2022
Unconvincing
Unconvincing. Long winded and repetitive argument. We tangible world issues to address without being distracted by a non hypothetical issue.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!