Lost in Math
How Beauty Leads Physics Astray
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $28.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Laura Jennings
About this listen
A contrarian argues that modern physicists' obsession with beauty has given us wonderful math but bad science
Whether pondering black holes or predicting discoveries at CERN, physicists believe the best theories are beautiful, natural, and elegant, and this standard separates popular theories from disposable ones. This is why, Sabine Hossenfelder argues, we have not seen a major breakthrough in the foundations of physics for more than four decades. The belief in beauty has become so dogmatic that it now conflicts with scientific objectivity: observation has been unable to confirm mindboggling theories, like supersymmetry or grand unification, invented by physicists based on aesthetic criteria. Worse, these "too good to not be true" theories are actually untestable and they have left the field in a cul-de-sac. To escape, physicists must rethink their methods. Only by embracing reality as it is can science discover the truth.
©2018 Sabine Hossenfelder (P)2018 Brilliance Publishing, Inc., all rights reserved.What listeners say about Lost in Math
Average Customer RatingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Jaz
- 21-01-2023
Too technical and repetitive
The blurb sounded really interesting, and the premise is interesting, but you can basically get the main point within a couple of chapters and then it is just repetitive. As a non-physicist I was hoping I'd come away with an increased understanding of theoretical physics, but most of the explanations are overly complex and not accessible to non-physicists. Also, alot of interviews of senior male physicists, sad it took the single female interviewed to actually ask what the author herself thought. I enjoyed some of the discussion in the later chapters, e.g. about the role of philosophers in science and explanation of cognitive biases. And at least I understand why Sheldon and Amy's Nobel Prize is significant in 'The Big Bang Theory' now.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!